It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sauron
There is only a few people who claim the NPT No Plane Theory as fact.
ATS is one of only a few places that have not banned this line of thinking
Originally posted by Sauron
As long as members aren't being a smart alec and they abide by the T&C, They have the same rights as any other member has to state there thoughts and opinions.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
So to be clear, nothing is taboo, no matter how reprehensible or ignorant it is, as long as it conforms to T&C rules?
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
There's nothing wrong with people making up anything they like and bringing it here for discussion
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
That's the TM in a nushell.
Make stuff up, then defend it to the death.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
That's a very strong accusation and I'm going to call you out on it. I challenge you to make a thread and point out the things that the truth movement has purposely made up.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Sorry, but he's a truther. He's part of your clan. Wear it with pride.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
No where in the truth movement is NPT accepted,
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by ipsedixit
I'm sorry, sir/madam. Nothing in this post makes any sense, it is not accurate aerodynamically.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
I'm sorry, sir/madam. Nothing in this post makes any sense, it is not accurate aerodynamically.
I suggest further research, because somehow you've gotten certain impressions of how airplanes fly, and their effect on the surrounding air, quite wrong. UNLESS it's just your phraseology. Perhaps if the Source of your opinion were offered, we could attempt to examine it more closely, and see your line of reason.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Not to mention, this person didn't read all the posts in this thread to even know that the vortex "theory" was already debunked on the first page.