NASA STS127 transmission 23.50 GMT 24th July, 2009.

...

NASA STS127 transmission 23.50 GMT 24th July, 2009.

The footage below has been uploaded on youtube recently
by user Streetcap.

...

Several smaller 'objects' appear which seem to be reflections.
Uploader is pointing out to these.

However, what is this huge ring-like object?

According to the uploader the shape just floated into
screen, after a few minutes the transmission was cut.

Ideas anyone?
Did anyone watch this live?

NASA STS-127 Report #19 Friday, July 24, 2009 - 7 p.m. CDT

www.spaceref.com...

NASA STS-127 Report #20 Saturday, July 25, 2009 - 5:00 a.m. CDT

www.spaceref.com...

...

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/f789a9432302.jpg[/atsimg]

...

The ISS seems to be making some kind of maneuver.

Notice in the first video that just before NASA cuts
the transmission, some large shadows appear at the
right bottom and middle.

At 00:10, at 00:20, at 01:00, at 01:48, at 02:08 and at 02:24,
it appears something is moving on the ISS.
It is two areas at the top on the right side.
Or is it shadows/reflections?
Left of this another shadow appears around 00:24.

...



...

This is a section of the footage that is speeded up.

...



...

Kind of a close-up.

...



...

Here, with some contrast adjustments.

...



...

So what are we looking at here?

...
..
.

Originally posted by Sol12
So what are we looking at here?

Here those are lens flares...notice the donut-shape (characteristic from catadioptric lens, ussualy used on the shuttle), and even the hexagonal shape of them can be guessed
So, they are reflexions inside the lens, from the sun.



[edit on 26/7/09 by depthoffield]

reply to post by depthoffield


What about the ring shape?

...

Originally posted by Sol12
reply to post by depthoffield

 

What about the ring shape?

...

The big ring, I mean.

...

there are several pictures with a similar anomaly. I agree that the one we see in your post is far more clear, dosn't neccesarilly mean it not the same reflection we see in other pics and vids. I am by no means a professional and hope that some here will be able to better explain this.

Really awesome find, Thank you.

here is just one link to similar pics taken by the ISS.
You can also google other pics.

reply to post by jonny420ls


Thanks.

It looks kind of solid.

Maybe someone can identify it.

...

Very interesting, although I can't say for certain what we see here is a UFO (unidentified flyling object) I can say for 100% certain and can prove that NASA are not to be trusted one IOTA.

These videos come on to this site and straight away we hear LENS FLARE, PARALLAX, ICE CRYSTALS, I don't know about you but its getting a wee bit monotonous. Can we just agree that we humans might not be the be all and end all of the whole universe? or am I being ignorant

Just to put my money where my mouth this is why NASA can't be trusted

Google Video Link

of course the people that follow NASA for reasons of their own will never watch these videos

[edit on 26-7-2009 by franspeakfree]

Originally posted by franspeakfree
Can we just agree that we humans might not be the be all and end all of the whole universe? or am I being ignorant

Agreed.

I'm not saying this is ETs.

It is unidentified.

There may be a reasonable explanation.

...

reply to post by franspeakfree


I agree with you. I was merely pointing out a scientific reason with proof of similarity. On the other hand I really am surprised that the ring is solid and appears to be moving. The ring also has a defined color and isn't oscilating from blue-yellow-red and so on.This is such a cool find and I hope someone can provide more insight.

reply to post by Sol12


Agreed.

I'm not saying this is ETs.

It is unidentified.

There may be a reasonable explanation.

...


yes and that was totally and unmistakenly a flying saucer with alien greys in side of the craft.....there i just identified it....

no really it seriously does look like a moving craft in that last video.....S+F

reply to post by soldier8828


Nice one.



...

These have all been debunked many times. And why do those who claim NASA has faked all the Moon missions ignore the hundreds of hours of archive footage from the Apollo missions? Out of sheer ignorance is the reason why!

I find it amusing how the pro moon-landing hoax crowd get easily taken in by silly videos full of bad-science and false logic approaches that only sound credible to those who haven't thought about the claims or haven't looked at both sides of the argument. You will feel an idiot when you make this same realisation.

Oh wait I guess you're going to call me a government spy as often gets thrown around here.

[edit on 26-7-2009 by john124]

Originally posted by john124
These have all been debunked many times. And why do those who claim NASA has faked all the Moon missions ignore the hundreds of hours of archive footage from the Apollo missions? Out of sheer ignorance is the reason why!

I find it amusing how the pro moon-landing hoax crowd get easily taken in by silly videos full of bad-science and false logic approaches that only sound credible to those who haven't thought about the claims or haven't looked at both sides of the argument. You will feel an idiot when you make this same realisation.

Oh wait I guess you're going to call me a government spy as often gets thrown around here.

[edit on 26-7-2009 by john124]

SPY!!

err..


I will say that if we could stay on topic of the photos that were taken, in the OP, that would be nice. Not everyone who thinks there might be more to these photos than "lens flare", etc, subscribes as well to the idea that the moon landings were hoaxed.

Don't lump everyone up into one category from which you can then cry "debunked". THAT is something I DO see happening a lot around here.

We'll get a picture or a vid of something strange, someone else will come in with the "moon landing hoaxed" theory, and then the topic of the original picture/vid/etc gets played into peoples minds as being lumped together with those moon hoaxed theorists. There's NO correlation between the two.

It seems to be illuminated, the "large object" and in the speeded up version the little dots show up as it moves so maybe that dots are little...reflections?...is that the right word? Maybe it something small and close to the camera instead of something large and in the distance. Just me speculating though!

reply to post by Jomina


...

Thanks Jomina,
for looking after the shop.

...

reply to post by john124


...

Please stay on topic.

You are free to start a thread, as you know.

...

reply to post by HarlieQuinn


...

Hi.

...

uhm...

Did I say something wrong?

I wouldn't be suprised if I said something stupid.


Oh...and..

Hi.

...

Originally posted by HarlieQuinn
uhm...

Did I say something wrong?

I wouldn't be suprised if I said something stupid.


Oh...and..

Hi.

...

No.

I just wanted to say hi.

Hi.

...

The small donut rings are lens flares, they can be seen as such in part of this other video,www.youtube.com...
The big ring does not seem to move, but rather it is the ISS that moves.So the big ring could be a reflection of the camera itself just fading in and out of the available light.If the ISS does move its position, it's for a reason, meeting up with a Progress supply ship, or the Shuttle(both happened recently)and they would use burns from other vehicles to maintain orbit,since there is drag on the solar panels.

[edit on 26-7-2009 by smurfy]