It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by xmotex
We are not in Afghanistan because the Taliban were repressive, but because the Taliban sheltered and supported the organization that turned 3,000 New Yorkers into pulverized ash
I was a strong opponent of the Iraq invasion, but we're in Afghanistan because we were attacked. Period.
There was no other logical choice.
Originally posted by xmotex
There was no other logical choice.
Originally posted by KSPigpen
Is it the job of the United States to defeat ALL oppressive regimes? If it is, we better get on with China.
Originally posted by xmotex
We are not in Afghanistan because the Taliban were repressive, but because the Taliban sheltered and supported the organization that turned 3,000 New Yorkers into pulverized ash
I was a strong opponent of the Iraq invasion, but we're in Afghanistan because we were attacked. Period.
There was no other logical choice.
Originally posted by xmotex
We are not in Afghanistan because the Taliban were repressive, but because the Taliban sheltered and supported the organization that turned 3,000 New Yorkers into pulverized ash
I was a strong opponent of the Iraq invasion, but we're in Afghanistan because we were attacked. Period.
There was no other logical choice.
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
Originally posted by xmotex
We are not in Afghanistan because the Taliban were repressive, but because the Taliban sheltered and supported the organization that turned 3,000 New Yorkers into pulverized ash
I was a strong opponent of the Iraq invasion, but we're in Afghanistan because we were attacked. Period.
There was no other logical choice.
It's a bit insulting to all the other nations who lost people in the World Trade centre to make the astonishing claim that they were all New Yorkers! If we're going to go down your road of reasoning why doesn't America attack Saudi Arabia as most of the alleged hijackers came from that country? Why not arrest Rumsfeld for selling Iraq the very weapons which were used against coalition soldiers?
Originally posted by Haydn_17
The US could never take over the world, china and russia have more nukes combined than america. And the Chinese army is huuuge beyond belief.
Originally posted by KSPigpen
Many historians will argue that the US could never take over Afghanistan either, but yet, there we ARE....thinking somehow we are more capable than Russia was to force the submission of another nation.
Originally posted by KSPigpen
Originally posted by Haydn_17
The US could never take over the world, china and russia have more nukes combined than america. And the Chinese army is huuuge beyond belief.
Many historians will argue that the US could never take over Afghanistan either, but yet, there we ARE....thinking somehow we are more capable than Russia was to force the submission of another nation.
Originally posted by Discotech
Originally posted by KSPigpen
So I don't really know why you're talking like the US alone have taken over Afghanistan when they are far from having done it
If you read the post, Disco, you will see that I never claimed the US has taken over Afghanistan....
'Many historians will argue that the US could never take over Afghanistan either, but yet, there we ARE....thinking somehow we are more capable than Russia was to force the submission of another nation.'
No occupying force will EVER 'take over' Afghanistan. Ever. The Taliban are 'boogeymen.' They are someone to blame for the evils our government has perpetrated. Our 'leaders' have not become any more intelligent than they were when they though hundreds of thousands of human lives into the meat grinder in Viet Nam. This is nno different; The only thing different is they gave the boogeyman a different name.