It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kaytagg
reply to post by ntech
I don't understand your argument for why cap and trade is unconstitutional. I'm not a lawyer, either, but I noticed the link you sent doesn't seem to have a part on "Article 1 section 9 para. 4."
Are you sure this is unconstitutional, or do you just wish it were?
I think Cap and trade is a bad idea, overall. I have no idea what to do about climate change, but taxing carbon output should be heavily debated before endorsing any particular legal options.
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
Originally posted by GreenGlassDoor
reply to post by ntech
One problem, Pollock v. Farmers' Loan and Trust was nullified in 1913 with the passage of the 16th Amendment which states:
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
In fact, the Pollock case directly affected Congress, hence their modification of the Constitution. See?