It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by reject
reply to post by jkrog08
nowadays, something like this would be dismissed as chinese lanterns...I'm telling you people, we should pull together and ban chinese lanterns
somebody stabilize the video, please...stat!
Originally posted by Heliocentric
Originally posted by reugen
Looks a lot like the German Messershmitt "Komet" or Me-163 that was built and used at the end of the war, 1944-1945.
"Looks a lot like"?
To me it's an overstatement, but I guess it's subjective.
Taken from Wikipedia (on the history of Me-163):
"Five Me 163s were originally brought to the United States in 1945, receiving the Foreign Equipment numbers FE-495 and FE-500 to 503 ... On 12 April 1946, it was flown aboard a cargo aircraft to the U.S. Army Air Forces facility at Muroc dry lake in California for flight testing."
So there were only 5 of them, and they went to California, which is pretty far away from Utah.
If the Tremonton UFOs were some kind of experimental craft developed from it, how many of them would they build, and how many would they send up at once? One or two, or a whole fleet?
And were is the documentation of this craft?
And if these UFOs were experimental crafts with rocket engines, where are the chemtrails?
[edit on 23-6-2009 by Heliocentric]
In the final months of World War II, American troops discovered a top-secret facility in Germany with an advanced batwing-shaped jet fighter. If Nazi engineers had had more time, would this jet have ultimately changed the outcome of the war?
Hitlers Stealth Fighter
Originally posted by reugen You know that Germany had a lot of other experimental type of planes, there is much the public dont know even today. How much do you know about Operation Paperclip and what remains hidden even today ? What kind of material och prototypes were brought from Germany to the US after the war ?
Originally posted by Myrmecobius[/i
reply to post by Norge
I'm made of "specific material". The guys at the observatory aren't likely to be materials scientists. Or qualified to comment on video adulteration techiniques. Think of it this way: when you're ill do you consult an astronomer? But let's assume they are right about the astronomy.
The straights of north-western Turkey are a migrating bird of prey motorway (sharing the top honours with Gibralter). Add in a bit of bio-luminesence along the leading edge and our perceptual habit of completing lines and you have the shape you see.
If the delta shape is real and not a visual artefact, well, it's most likely a kite with a bit of luminous paint. Not suggesting the guy faked it, simply filmed someone unknown flying their kite at night. If you fly a kite at night wouldn't you make it luminous in some way? Is that a nice kite-flying wind I can hear in the recording?
Originally posted by Heliocentric
***snip***
If the Tremonton UFOs were some kind of experimental craft developed from it, how many of them would they build, and how many would they send up at once? One or two, or a whole fleet?
***snip***
Originally posted by jkrog08
You realize that the velocity tests, accel/decel tests, and speed tests rule out birds right?
Also the self luminous issue is not resolved.
The original tests done, which were far better than anything you or me could do with a film copy showed that they were not birds in all likelihood.
**snip***
The movements do not match birds either, look at some of the objects moving, two of them are in a classic parallel aircraft formation (ie; wingmen),
also the objects seem to be moving circular but 'drifting', while in the movements some objects make intelligent looking motions.
I highly doubt these are birds, so did the USAF and US Navy, only the bunk CIA ran Robertson Panel said they were birds, and their explanation was nothing more than "they look like birds I have seen".
This is considered not probable because of the length of time they were viewed continuously on the film, approximately 90 seconds.
the film comprises about 1,200 frames
The relative angular velocity might be compatible with soaring bird speeds at distances of less than one mile, the angular velocity of the single object could be attributed to a bird within about one thousand feet.
The evicence remains rather contradictory…
At these distances it is doubted if birds would give the appearence of round dots...
No specific conclusions as to sun reflection angles can be drawn since the line of motion of the objects cannot be confirmed.
This premise would permit highly reflective ballons or spheroids to be a possibility. However the velocity and accelleration computations rule this possibility out.
1000 feet - velocity of single object 27 mph
5 miles - velocity of single object 670 mph
The estimated velocity was anywhere between 378-3748 mph depending on actual distance of objects and compensation for shaky film. Most have settled on 665 mph for a mean speed. However that is still supersonic.
Estimated distance from observer was 5 miles
Film was reprinted in 35mm by the USAF for better clarity and to avoid further degradation of the original
To prepare plots of the objects, a stop frame projector was rigidly mounted at a fixed distance from a finely-ground glass screen. *** This proved very satisfactory and provided a shadow free image upon which overlay plots could be made.
Size and luminosity varied throughout the film
The size is based on the assumption that the objects are five miles from the observer.
The preliminary data uncovered were revealed to experts in the fields of astronomy and physics.
As to the results of the investigations being reported, no attempt was made to corroborate the opinions presented. Because of the lack of proper equipment, money and personnel, the investigation was limited. There are obvious tests which can be conducted to prove or disprove some of the findings prsented. It is suggested that these be undertaken.
There was no reference point in the sky so it was impossible for him to make any estimates as to size, speed, or distance
Another strong possibility is that the objects were sea gulls soaring thermal air current. Movies of sea gulls taken under similar lighting conditions showed the sea gulls appearing as bright spots of light very similar to those in the movies. At the present time the Air Force contemplates no future action will be taken to identify the objects.
This film could not be duplicated under simulated conditions.
The objects appear to be a light source rather than reflected light.
All the objects appear to be the same size and circular in shape.
At a distance of five miles, with the movement perpendicular to the line of sight, the average velocity is 653.5 mph. Likewise, at 2.5 miles the average speed is 326.75 mph.
The movement in flight appears to follow an elliptical or circular pattern, within the group.
While the objects are unidentified, the following possibilities have been eliminated:
Balloons
Aircraft
Birds
The image structure & maneuvers eliminates any type of aircraft.
Microscopic examinations show that the objects are in focus and 1/6th to 1/10 the size of the full moon with the naked eye.
Photogrammetric experiments have shown that the images cannot be associated with any type of bird observation at any distance.
Because the analysts noted the complete absence of any evidence to indicate birds, such as fluttering, birds were the first and easiest discarded explanation. There was almost a complete consensus that birds could not be the explanation; it was so untenable that the analysis concentrated on reasonable other possible causes such as balloon or aircraft.
It was the opinion of the P.I.L. representatives that the objects sighted were not birds, balloons or aircraft, were "not reflections because there was no blinking while passing through 60 degrees of arc" and were, therefore, "self-luminous." Plots of motion and variation in light intensity of the objects were displayed.
It should be emphasized that neither of the two analysis remotely
Can you say it out loud - ASSUMPTION.
Why not from other fields? Ornothology comes to mind.
This is important. If they were self luminous please explain - why the variatio?
Soo much more likely isn't it? If we decide from the start that we are looking for alien craft.
As I claimed in my post with the keyframing. THEY DID NOT KEYFRAME.
They plotted on a pice of glass. This method cannot enable you to view the film again with all the movements seen together live. Keyframing - or better still motion tracking - will let you see the actual movements and then one can recognize natural patterns as in soaring birds.
WOW!
How come this wasn't mentioned in the synopsis?
Is it possible that it didn't fit the purpose of the exersize?