It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
reply to post by Xtraeme
That has to be too vague, you got to put ou definite statements.
Every yokel will agree with that statement.
some form of intelligence: that would be human
UFOs represent: flying crafts
I was going to suggest those that have the dispute engine take in
suggestions but the popups had one installation get kicked out.
Buy the time I found Clusty was the engine I found Lafferenz was the
sub name.
Lets see:
It is disinformation that Lafferenz subs made it to the East Coast US
shores with V2 rockets since that mention prohibits the thought other
rockets were used.
Originally posted by Strype
reply to post by Xtraeme
Thanks for the example Xtrame. I'm still curious as to whether or not it's really giving both sides of the story though. Lets say it highlights "Oswald was just a patsy for the CIA when he assassinated JFK" and tells you that he possibly acted on his own. If you go to another page, will it highlight "Oswald acted on his own in the assassination of JFK" and tell you that he was possibly a patsy for the CIA?
Any idea?
Originally posted by Strype
reply to post by Xtraeme
Thanks for the example Xtrame. I'm still curious as to whether or not it's really giving both sides of the story though. Lets say it highlights "Oswald was just a patsy for the CIA when he assassinated JFK" and tells you that he possibly acted on his own. If you go to another page, will it highlight "Oswald acted on his own in the assassination of JFK" and tell you that he was possibly a patsy for the CIA?
Any idea?
Yeah. You are correct. On the page for a claim, you can link to an "opposing claim" which is an alternative statement that disagrees.
In the current version the opposing claims don't appear in the popup view, but they probably will in the future.
As you said, it's important to allow these alternative phrasings in order to avoid the choice of language biasing the debate.
Thanks for the feedback.
-Rob