Twin Towers To Be REBUILT!

Imagine that, wouldn't that be just amazing? Not only that but bigger, stronger, safer and more ergonomically advanced than before. It may not be too late.



Donald Trump Calls Freedom Tower Disgusting. I for one agree with him on this 100%

Donald speaks much sense in the interview. What better way to get back at the terrorists for what they did and restore Americas pride and the NY skyline to how it should look, what better way to heal the city and western society as a whole? It would show to the world what America REALLY stands for and is capable of, and that it won't back down to attack but instead it will get back up on it's feet stronger, taller and safer than before. I say REBUILD THE TWIN TOWERS!

Let's face it, the freedom tower is failing in it's current location, it's small and it's ugly, it's vulnerable to attacks from truck bombs and it's having design issues yet again. It has a skeleton on top called the spire which is an empty space of columns that looks like a windmill with a spike at the top which to me resembles the final moments of crumbling steel core of the original north tower to me more than anything else. It's almost as if the terrorists got what they wanted, it's very, very sad to see.

But perhaps there is still hope..



Latest Interview With Ken Gardner March 2009 - Rebuild The Twin Towers - Last Chance Everyone ACT NOW

Make a stand - Sign this petition:
www.twintowersalliance.com...

"America is too great for small dreams." — Ronald Reagan

"There is nothing wrong in America that can’t be fixed
with what is right in America." — Bill Clinton



Make New York - New York Again.

Please check out the site:
www.twintowersalliance.com...

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/94e5431d9cd6.jpg[/atsimg]

[edit on 25-4-2009 by Insolubrious]

OK...

That black guys hair in the second video is the single funniest thing I've ever seen on ATS!!

Does he even look in the mirror?!?!

Back on topic...

Laughing too hard, come back and leave opinion later

The Freedom Tower design (they've renamed it now to something else I think) is digusting and will horribly disfigure the New York skyline. I want it back as it was.

It is excellent to see Donald Trump speaking out on this. I hope it gets more attention.

reply to post by YourForever


i believe is has been renamed the "One World Trade Center" tower. kinda creepy eh? people say its because that's what all new yorkers has been calling it, cause well there is one trade center instead of two.


still creeps me out lol.

reply to post by breakingdradles

That black guys hair in the second video is the single funniest thing I've ever seen on ATS!! Does he even look in the mirror?!?!

It's chic, glossy and fab-u-lous. I think you're just jealous.


To the OP: The Freedom Tower is indeed a hideous design. I'm undecided about what should be built there, but leaving it as an empty area is also not acceptable. I'm just thinking of how terrible it would be if we rebuilt the towers and something were to happen to them again.

I do not know any residents of NYC who agree with the building of the Freedom Tower. It seems a terrible offense to construct a building over the site of a tragedy when that building is so widely despised by locals.

Also, I just want to point out the foolishness of the moniker. What about 9/11 or the events thereafter relate to either the acquisition or sustaining of freedom for Americans or foreigners? Just like Freedom Fries, this is another idiotic attempt at a "gotcha" to that great undefined enemy. It's childish and insulting.

Ok, rebuild the towers, restore the skyline and so on. Fine.

Who's going to fill the buildings?

reply to post by TheLoony


Donald Trump says that if people won't fill the buildings, to make a huge memorial park. But I'm betting that if future tenants felt safe in knowing that the towers were built stronger (not like the original one's weren't strong enough) and if the government restricted the airspace around the WTC complex as it does in DC, then I think the tenants would come back.

SnF to the OP. Great thread. Great video by The Donald and I agree 100% with what he's saying.

Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Donald Trump says that if people won't fill the buildings, to make a huge memorial park. But I'm betting that if future tenants felt safe in knowing that the towers were built stronger (not like the original one's weren't strong enough) and if the government restricted the airspace around the WTC complex as it does in DC, then I think the tenants would come back.

I don't understand this whole thread...?

If you believe it was terrorists with box cutters, then do you think that they're going to care about flying into restricted airspace *again*? They already know that jet fuel can bring down a tower, so what's stopping them from trying *again*? Maybe they could try two or three planes into one tower, if they get rebuilt stronger... whatever that's meant to mean.

If you don't believe it was terrorists with box cutters, then you're probably thinking that the towers were collapsed with some help. Therefore, it wouldn't matter how restricted the airspace is or how strong the towers will be rebuilt, they can still be collapsed by whoever wants them to tumble.

Either way, any new tower can still be brought down.

If you believe that it was box cutter terrorists, then I can understand why you would want to replace the old with the new. National pride and all of those other silly emotions would want you to thumb your noses at the world and show it how great the USA is. Wave the flag, blah blah blah.

If you believe that it was partly a government operation, then why the hell would you want the towers rebuilt? That would be their final victory! They would be thumbing their noses at you. They destroyed those towers and you know it, but you're so proud, righteous and flag-waving because they rebuilt them for you?

I don't get it. I really don't understand patriotism, national pride and ego. It's all manipulative crap. It's the kind of formula that's pumped out by the MSM on an hourly basis to remind you of your duty. Yes you, citizen, your duty.

Turn Ground Zero into a cemetary to represent the ideals of a corrupted, diseased modern day, US.gov.com company. For too long, too many people pretend that everything's all right with the world, when it's not.

Edit: Bonez, the 'you' in my post are referring to the collective 'you', not you personally. I only used your quote to open my post. I wasn't meaning to be harsh at you. It seems that way upon reading, sorry!

[edit on 25-4-2009 by tezzajw]

I had herd that the address of the new building , as well as its name will be One World Trade Center , hmmmmmmm .

"behold our final masterpiece friends, the temple on the island of atum, and out of the primordial waters comes from what was 2, a singular vision..socialism..just joking ..haha..but no im serious.

anyway moving on..

relax brothers and sisters..elders of the ministry.

WE have made america..great ..for us..

and so i hereby declare that this tower is built

yeehawww time for fun by which i mean ***** ***** and *** ***** and ******* **** so you see it all makes sense to be eletists like us!"

-a what if scenario for any future secret ceremony they may have in there.

Yeah, cause the public really needs a skycraper to remind them that they're governments attempted to take over the world by killing it's own people. I am sure that's what the survivors and familes of those people who died sure want.

How about this, how about we make the thing into a damn memorial like it should be, and not disgrace the skies with something else that can be torn down with "two little planes" and an hour worth of burning.

Gee I wonder what kind of story they'd come up with nextime. Perhaps the jets will be filled with liquid hot "magma" [Insert Dr. Evil Picture] instead of jet fuel and that will make them fall down.

No but seriously folks, there is no need for America to make this into a huge thing. It should be a memorial, not to be re-raised and reused so that people forget the tragedy that was placed upon those people.

BIG, GREEN, OPEN, BEAUTIFUL MEMORIAL

Plain and simple,

~KEeper

Why not call it 'Terror tower(s)'; sounds similar to Terry Thomas, the late, great English actor. His smile would be kind of symbolic

Originally posted by tezzajw
Edit: Bonez, the 'you' in my post are referring to the collective 'you', not you personally. I only used your quote to open my post. I wasn't meaning to be harsh at you. It seems that way upon reading, sorry!

No worries.

I hope people are taking a minute to sign the petition.

[edit on 25-4-2009 by _BoneZ_]

reply to post by tezzajw


And restricting the air space around the rebuilt towers would not prevent the government psyops agents from planting demolition charges AGAIN.

Originally posted by tothetenthpower
Yeah, cause the public really needs a skycraper to remind them that they're governments attempted to take over the world by killing it's own people. I am sure that's what the survivors and familes of those people who died sure want.

How about this, how about we make the thing into a damn memorial like it should be, and not disgrace the skies with something else that can be torn down with "two little planes" and an hour worth of burning.

Gee I wonder what kind of story they'd come up with nextime. Perhaps the jets will be filled with liquid hot "magma" [Insert Dr. Evil Picture] instead of jet fuel and that will make them fall down.

No but seriously folks, there is no need for America to make this into a huge thing. It should be a memorial, not to be re-raised and reused so that people forget the tragedy that was placed upon those people.

BIG, GREEN, OPEN, BEAUTIFUL MEMORIAL

Plain and simple,

~KEeper

Summarized pretty completely. You took away all need to add to this thread. Starred

reply to post by tezzajw


Wtc 7 was rebuilt by Silverstein - it incorporated new features in
design and construction to improve safety

The buildings structural core was made of a concrete/steel mix versus
all steel in the original WTC 7.

Stairways and elevator shafts were made of reinforced concrete 2 ft
thick vs only drywall in original

Improved thicker fire proofing was applied to steel support columns

The building is being promoted as the safest skyscraper in the U.S.[71] According to Silverstein Properties, the owner of the building, it "will incorporate a host of life-safety enhancements that will become the prototype for new high-rise construction".[72] The building has 2 ft (60 cm) thick reinforced-concrete and fireproofed elevator and stairway access shafts. The original building used only drywall to line these shafts.[73] The stairways are wider than in the original building to permit faster egress.[73] Steel columns are encased in much thicker fire protection, which consists of a medium-density, portland cement-based product that adheres well to the steel columns, among other advantages over alternate types of spray-applied fire-resistive material.[

I could see the original twin towers from my neighborhood - I wish they
could be restored with improved construction techniques and safety
factors

I remember being in NYC about ten years ago, we were getting tickets for broadway in the WTC. I remember standing in front of the entrance of one of them, the tower actually bowed to/above me, never had such an impressive experience with a skycraper..Of course the twins must return! they should have started building in '03..

[edit on 25-4-2009 by Foppezao]

reply to post by Insolubrious


Not to derail the thread, but did he say in the second video "now imagine if your tax payer dollars would pay for the whole thing. That's exactly what's happening with the freedom tower...."?

What happened to "poor" Larry losing money on this?

Edit: Did he also say? "public hearings so the public can weigh in on this idiot spending another 4 billion dollars..."

I have laptop speakers, so it's hard to tell.

[edit on 4/26/2009 by Griff]

Yup, because they have run out of funding Larry is now asking for the tax payers money to finish the job. Perhaps if the tax payers actually wanted a freedom tower it wouldn't be so bad, but getting the tax payers to front the money for a building they ultimately hate, I think is criminal.