posted on Mar, 31 2009 @ 02:59 PM
You know when you are looking for something, and you can't find it? Well, then you go a little while later and look for something else, and stumble
across the first thing you were looking for earlier? We've all done it! We've all had that AHA moment when you see something and say to yourself,
"Hey, I was looking for this!" Why doesn't the same apply to missing persons? Think about it. When a search party goes out (and usually it is a
BIG search party covering several places and looking over, under and around everything purposefully looking for one person) why don't they find other
missing people? I mean, it's like Murphy's Law or something in everyday life, why not in this situation? For example, you hear that search crews
have found remains and are being sent for analysis. The body they find, it seems like, is always the ones they are looking for, never anyone else
that has been missing (and couldn't be found before). I mean with all the thousands of people that have gone missing in the history of time, why
aren't we finding more "by accident"? You never hear, "oh, they were looking for Tammy and found Jake from five years ago". Do you think this
would be a strong arguement for abduction? That the people weren't "missing" to begin with? Simply gone?
[edit on 31-3-2009 by scrubsnstuffkim]