It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Freedom Under Fire: U.N. Anti-Blasphemy Resolution

page: 1

log in


posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 01:27 PM

Freedom Under Fire: U.N. Anti-Blasphemy Resolution
I'll let the video do the talking:

[edit on 2/27/2009 by NoArmsJames]

[edit on 2/27/2009 by NoArmsJames]

posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 01:27 PM
Absolutely disgusting. I do not believe in the NWO, but I believe there is something just as dangerous; this extreme political correctness. They want us to bend over backwards so as not to offend the religious...NO!
I love freedom of speech and I'll do anything to defend it. I like having the freedom to offend you by criticizing your religion, and I love the fact that you can turn right around and criticize me just as harshly. This is getting ridiculous...
(visit the link for the full news article)

posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 01:48 PM
As i said no one will speak against the muslim faith..they fear for there life's.

It will spread till all are mulims..

Now the u.n will back there belief and make it illegal to speak ill of there religion.

But piss on Christians Jewish and every other religion... your fair game..
But dont you speak bad about our head cutting jihad killing religion.
Or you go to jail...WTF

posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 01:49 PM
This is EXACTLY why America was founded... to escape religious overlords of then the "Roman church".

Now we see history repeating itself, this time with Islam.

Again, we see the true colors of the UN. A corrupt organization with dreams of power over people.

I don't agree with 3/4 of the people in this country on most issues... but having the freedom to debate and speak out against things or for things is our foremost RIGHT.

Suppression of the freedom of speech under the guise of "hate crimes". What a freaking POS organization.

God, I hope we come to our senses and throw these morons out of our country. Let them babble and make useless resolutions on someone's dime.

[edit on 27-2-2009 by infolurker]

posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 01:53 PM
I love Lou Dobb's show.

He is the only honest person here in the American media.

I agree, the UN better not trample on our constitution.

If they do I have no problem reinstating the monroe doctrine...

posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 02:02 PM
This is a joke - the implication that the UN would find "speaking ill of religion" to be offensive ? ha

I find the UN's practices of roasting small children over an open flame as an "acceptable" form of punishment to be highly offensive........and that is by no means the worst of their practices

A short read of the attached link (which contains harrowing pics) gives some indication of what the UN are really all about


posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 02:04 PM
reply to post by suziwong

What makes you think that they're doing this because they find the speech of Islam to be offensive?

There is clearly another hidden motive to this. They're appeasing the Muslims around the world to placate them to let others not criticize them so they can have a new world order with potentially the Muslim religion all powerful. i don't know... I'm not being bigoted here but that's just a thought. I've read some conspiracies about the UN and how they want a one world religion or perhaps they're doing it because they want to outlaw the criticism of the religion to TEST people to see how willing they are to accept such a ban of criticism so they can do anything they want to.

posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 02:11 PM
I'll admit that I had to Google the Monroe Doctrine. After reading about it I totally agree with you. I'm thinking we oughtta get out of the UN too.

posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 02:16 PM
Does the UN want to start a war with the US? What the hell is going on here? They have to know that this is something Americans will fight for.

posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 02:35 PM
Well, I'm just throwing ideas around, and this is HIGHLY unlikely.
Maybe the UN puts this resolution forward, it's rejected and they look at the sponsors (I believe Pakistan was mentioned) and say "hey sorry, we tried".

Like I said, highly unlikely.

posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 02:39 PM
I have no doubt that you are right - there is an underhand agenda behind every move made and your idea that it is a "test" for public reaction sounds right on the button -
Testing times for everyone - the big question is, how much people are prepared to take before they wake up and snap!!

posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 03:03 PM
Be careful what you're saying cause they gonna burn down embassies, stone innocent tourists to death, et cetera et cetera.

If you back up on this one, you can kiss goodbye all your freedoms, not just freedom to speak.

posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 06:30 PM
I really don't see how this is the "powers that be" at work. I don't think it's a test run. I think it's a bunch of politically correct nit-wits caving under pressure to a bunch imaginary friend worshiping bullies.

posted on Feb, 27 2009 @ 11:52 PM
Personally, I say the US should just go ahead and subjigate the planet.
All this wishy-washy, back-door, political game playing isn't helping matters.
If we are going to be the constant bad guy, it doesn't matter.
Bring on the UN.
Let's clean house.
It's going to end up on our doorstep sooner or later.

Stupid, sissy rest-of-the-world.

top topics


log in