It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BetweenMyths
saturn.jpl.nasa.gov...
How does physics explain the ability of moons to be able to orbit in different directions around the same planet? Even if some moons are captures, I would have thought that Jupiters gravity would make those moons orbit in the same direction as the others.
Originally posted by rich23
reply to post by spacial
If you could have another go at explaining that, I'd appreciate it.
.
Originally posted by spacial
there's no reason why it wouldn't work in a vacuum...
Originally posted by spacial
When something is spun, matter wants to move away from the centre of where it is spun.
Like a neutron bomb kind of thing...
Or a discus thrower... or should i say the disk...
When something is spun all the atoms within that object desire to get away from the centre of what it is spinning around.
Each atom will fly out on a trajectory that would look like a helix.
The biggest question i ask myself is how long does it take for a penny to drop?
Originally posted by Johnmike
And FYI, classical mechanics does include such angular quantities as angular momentum and torque. You simply rediscovered aerodynamics, not any kind of antigravity. Try doing this in a vacuum and you'll see no difference in trajectory between the spinning and non-spinning ball.
Did the experimenter calculate the lift that would be generated and the hypothesized trajectory before running this experiment to find a divergence? Can any of us (I might have the time, but not now).
Originally posted by rich23
reply to post by TheWorldReallyIsThatBorin
My assertion is that the effect of the laminar flow on the path of the ball-bearing is negligible...
On the highest level of abstraction Force is Intelligence; consequently the primordial field is intelligent. Within the limits imposed by the capability of my human mind reality exists as it is. Its architecture is beyond the scope of my discovery.
The Tao that can be spoken is not the eternal Tao
Originally posted by rich23
Originally posted by spacial
When something is spun, matter wants to move away from the centre of where it is spun.
Like a neutron bomb kind of thing...
Or a discus thrower... or should i say the disk...
I'm being really quite patient here. You say you can explain things in terms of classical physics and then you talk about matter "wanting to move". The kind of classical physics that I grew up with describes this in terms of Newton's Laws of Motion, to wit that an object acted upon by a force will tend to move in a straight line unless acted upon by another force.
I'd ask you to explain what the hell you mean by "like a neutron bomb kind of thing", but... actually, I don't think I have that much time to waste. (Sorry, patience wearing a little bit thin there).
When something is spun all the atoms within that object desire to get away from the centre of what it is spinning around.
Each atom will fly out on a trajectory that would look like a helix.
Like a discus? I think you'll find that their trajectory, once released, is in a straight line away from the thrower, with of course a vertical component dictated by the laws of gravity. There's nothing helical about it.
I'm sorry, I'd deal with the rest of your points but my head started to fotate so fast it had a desire to get away from the centre of what it is spinning around.
The biggest question i ask myself is how long does it take for a penny to drop?
And, indeed, how long is a piece of string? I think the penny has dropped.
Originally posted by StargateSG7
This turbulent boundary layer has MEASURABLE EFFECTS
upon the aerodynamics of the balls and therefore their
angular momentum and resulting trajectory.
Ideally twin precision-machined Osmium or Platinum balls
of proven equal weight....