It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
February 18, 2009—A rare quail from the Philippines was photographed for the first time before being sold as food at a poultry market, experts say.
Found only on the island of Luzon, Worcester's buttonquail was known solely through drawings based on dated museum specimens collected several decades ago.
Scientists had suspected the species—listed as "data deficient" on the International Union for Conservation of Nature's 2008 Red List—was extinct.
A TV crew documented the live bird in the market (above) before it was sold in January, according to the Agence France-Press news agency.
Michael Lu, president of the Wild Bird Club of the Philippines, told AFP the bird's demise should inspire a "local consciousness" about the region's threatened wildlife.
"What if this was the last of its species?" Lu said.
However, the buttonquail is from a "notoriously cryptic and unobtrusive family of birds," according to the nonprofit Birdlife International, so the species may survive undetected in other regions.
February 18, 2009—A rare quail from the Philippines was photographed for the first time before being sold as food at a poultry market, experts say.
Originally posted by grover
What amazes me is the so what attitude some have expressed. Yes animals become extinct all the time and they get eaten... but I bet you would be singing a different tune if some hunter went out and shot the last bald eagle.
Originally posted by pteridine
Someone shooting the last bald eagle would be an unfortunate event but, surprisingly, bald eagles have little effect on everyday life.
Originally posted by LoneGunMan
Originally posted by pteridine
Someone shooting the last bald eagle would be an unfortunate event but, surprisingly, bald eagles have little effect on everyday life.
You are not seeing the big picture but your limited view.
We have a population of six billion, we have the technology and intellect to do serious damage to this world. It doesn't matter what extinction events happened in the past we must be the shepherds not the butchers.
At what point do we draw the line? It is hard to tell when we extinct the perfect link in the earths life cycle and the entire chain falls apart.
Sure the earth will survive and see new species. What we are protecting is not the earth but ourselves and our time. Given a few hundred more years and we could ensure our long term survival no matter what happens. We need to make it that far first.
Wake up and see the bigger picture. Think deeply instead of reacting.
Originally posted by pteridine
When we artificially save a species, for whatever reason, what are the unintended consequences? Will the species we save prevent another from developing? Will survival of the fittest mean survival of those we think are about to become extinct? How many species will you save and at what evolutionary cost?
To quote a famous evolutionist, "Wake up and see the bigger picture. Think deeply instead of reacting."