It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
posted by crmanager
reply to post by Stillresearchn911
Truthers can't have it both ways...
It was a controled explosion and there were no hijackers or there actual psychotic furballs whodid this.
posted by crmanager
That being said I stick by my original thought. If they tracked the hijackers that means there were hijackers so truthers are simply wrong.
Originally posted by crmanager
BTW, what on Earth has been said in this thread to justify "scrutiny?"
Originally posted by ipsedixit
reply to post by shortywarn
Here is the link to watch it online.
www.pbs.org...
I haven't seen it yet myself, but I have to say that, although I really like the programming on NOVA and Frontline, I always watch these programs with a Spockian eyebrow raised.
They are very slick with high production values, aimed at the intelligencia and potentially ideal vehicles for the subtle massaging of the facts.
Originally posted by esdad71
Actually, there were months of surveillance that were not reviewed that allowed 9/11 to happen. It was all there but overlooked. This is common knowledge. It was not allowed to happen but it was oversight based on not having enough people to staff the operation to review all of the information. We can thank military cuts in the 90's for that.
NSA listens to everything....
Originally posted by SPreston
posted by crmanager
reply to post by Stillresearchn911
Truthers can't have it both ways...
It was a controled explosion and there were no hijackers or there actual psychotic furballs whodid this.
Says who? You? Personally I believe there were no hijackers. There were covert agents with stolen identities pretending to be the 19 hijackers, and setting up false hijackers to be blamed for 9-11. They were deliberately leaving behind evidence and credit card numbers and hanging out in bimbo bars. There is no reliable evidence that any hijackers boarded the four original aircraft. There is evidence that some of them were trained on US Military bases, and some of them were trained in CIA centers.
However, this is how you could be wrong if there were actually hijackers on the four aircraft. The NSA and other control agents would have allowed them to board, allowed the aircraft to take off, killed every person on board with a quick acting nerve agent, and remotely taken over the aircraft and flown them out to an Atlantic graveyard or elsewhere. There were early reports that radar showed four aircraft off transponders flying out over the Atlantic.
At some point in each flight path, the aircraft would be merged on radar with a remotely flown military aircraft, the transponder codes switched, then transponders turned off and the hijackings simulated, and the new Flight 11-175-77-93 would be flown to its pre-planned target, while the original flight flew out to its deep water gravesite or elsewhere. Apparently something broke on the Flight 93 remote control system and the aircraft had to be destroyed far from its target.
Several of the flight paths flew directly over US Air Force bases and nuclear power plants. There is evidence that Flight 77 disappeared over Ohio and never returned to Virginia. There is evidence that there were two Flight 175s at Boston Logan. There is evidence that Flight 11 never took off as scheduled.
Two "Flight 175" taking off from Boston Logan: CONFIRMED
The key people picked out for cell phone and air phone transmissions would have been removed to secure locations (on the ground so their cell phones would work) to read their scripts at the right time, and if they were not part of the team, eliminated when their roles were complete. If there had been any hijackers in the aircraft, they and the original pilots would have been helpless to do anything about the remote takeover of their aircraft.
So the two aircraft could have been remotely flown into the towers whether or not there were hijackers. It would have been much easier because there would have been a skilled pilot remotely flying the aircraft, instead of suicidal Cessna rejects screwing everything up. The two aircraft which replaced Flights 11 and 175 could have had extra fuel tanks installed instead of passengers for much more splendid Shock & Awe special effects.
[edit on 2/3/09 by SPreston]
Originally posted by Seymour Butz
What?
So now we have the TM believing what the MSM AND one of the "three letter agencies" say?
What if this is all a deliberate disinfo campaign?
How does the collective intellect of the TM decide what to believe, and what to accept as true from the MSM and/or "three letter agencies" ?
SURELY it's NOT based on a filter that says "whenever they say something that I think helps my beliefs, they are beyond reproach, but when they say something that goes against my beliefs, they can't be trusted" ???????????
Originally posted by Stillresearchn911
The debunkers have not contested one thing that has come out of NIST's, FEMA, FBI, CIA, or the Commission's mouth you guys have backed it up 100 percent and then go and attack and insult people who do question it.