It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The distances of the high-redshift Type Ia supernovae are, on average, 10% to 15% farther than expected in a low mass density Universe without a cosmological constant. Different light curve fitting methods, SN Ia subsamples, and prior constraints unanimously favor eternally expanding models with positive cosmological constant and a current acceleration of the expansion.
science that do not observe things from all angles and excludes important elements... is called pseudo-science
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by donhuangenaro
science that do not observe things from all angles and excludes important elements... is called pseudo-science
What an absolutely perfect description of electric-universe crackpottery.
I salute you.
Originally posted by Astyanax
Now, do you have anything relevant to the topic to post on the thread, or did you just drop by to give your hobbyhorse a bit of an airing?
Originally posted by donhuangenaro
I warned people not to blindly believe mainstream-pseudo science observations (based on error and false suppositions), and I gave them alternative view
the fact that you don't see it and continue to attack me, speaks volumes about you and your so called 'reasonability'
Everything in the known universe is said to be racing toward the massive clumps of matter at more than 2 million miles (3.2 million kilometers) an hour—a movement the researchers have dubbed dark flow. The presence of the extra-universal matter suggests that our universe is part of something bigger—a multiverse—and that whatever is out there is very different from the universe we know, according to study leader Alexander Kashlinsky, an astrophysicist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland.
Originally posted by donhuangenaro
science that do not observe things from all angles and excludes important elements (like electric/plasma element) is called pseudo-science
what a huge mistake modern astrophysicists make by making theories based only on gravity...
I would be very skeptical by this 'observation' because by including missing elements you get smaller and slower universe (red shift is not equal to speed)
also, proven by simulations compared to existing objects in space, suppositions like black holes and black matter are not needed to explain universe around us
read here a different view
[edit on 29-1-2009 by donhuangenaro]
reply to post by squiz A typically well-informed post by ATS's resident electric-universe 'expert'. Of course red shift doesn't equate to distance. It relates to relative velocity. I thought even electric-universe promoters knew enough physics to know that. Here, read and learn something.