It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Astyanax
Meanwhile, of course, one was being constantly exposed to the moral contradictions of Christianity. Together with the obvious, transparent lies told by priests and other committed religious types to justify and advertise their favourite fairy tale, this had a far more discouraging effect on my faith than any scientific argument.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
reply to post by theresult
So you reject belief altogether. Was this always the case? Or did what you saw in the world over time lead you to the conclusion that truth cannot be known and your comfort with "knowing you dont know?"
Did it stop you from having religious or spiritual beliefs altogether? Or do you retain religious convictions and just reject the dogma?
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
For those of you who adhere to a religion,
"Has there ever been a time when evidence, scientific or otherwise has caused your belief system to change?"
I am not simply asking if it made you lose ALL faith in your God(s), (though if it did, feel free to say so), I am interested in how someone deals psychologically and philosophically with evidence that conflicts with their existing beliefs, particularly deeply held beliefs such as in a God.
For example, do you interweave the evidence into your belief system, by accepting the evidence and adjusting your belief system a bit? Reject the evidence entirely? Or does it cause a lack of faith?
Originally posted by Astyanax
Science and scientists get a lot of stick on this forum, portrayed usually as soulless mechanics, but the truth is that any scientist worth his subscription to Nature knows that there is a level beyond which we cannot go in knowing the universe; a fundamental limit to our understanding that is defined by the parameters of humanity itself - because we are the way we are, we can only understand so much, and only in a certain way.
Originally posted by Astyanax
You're a philosopher; you'll recognize traces of Spinoza in what I'm telling you. I only wish I had read him better.
Originally posted by reiki
To answer your question, the way i dealt with it all, was to go find out for myself. To not take anyones word for it, :-) .
Originally posted by reiki
I would interweave it into my own spirituality, if it stood up to scrutiny.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
So for you, evidence is an important deciding factor in your belief system, but you are very cautious about what you will consider evidence.
For the part of your spirituality that is a constant, that part that would be the constant that would hold all the other elements that may or may not change in the face of evidence you might discover, is it something you have concrete materialistic evidence for?
Or does it arise from a less tangible, (but not necessarily less valid) internal intuitive knowing that there is something Divine?
And thank you also for taking the time. I am very impressed with the quality of answers you all are giving.
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
is it directed specifically towards people who believe in an established religion - or did believe at one time?
Originally posted by reiki
It's a pleasure. BTW, are you doing this for some philosophical reason?
Originally posted by jon1
After reading these posts i feel a little sad that it it what MAN says and does that discourages people and weakens thier faith.
Originally posted by jon1
Faith should come from a relationship with God and it is on a one to one basis. If you know that God is real don't be discouraged by what others say or do.
Originally posted by jon1
Im my church i see so many people who act ungodly, it scares me sometimes, but i know that God is real. I just don't understand sometimes.