It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Pointing with concern to "red ink as far as the eye can see," President-elect Barack Obama pledged Wednesday to tackle out-of-control Social Security and Medicare spending and named a special watchdog to clamp down on other federal programs ...
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Obama is going through ALL the budgets and programs (line by line, remember?), revamping the whole mess. Getting rid of out-of-control spending on ineffective programs to get funding for the programs he campaigned on (like health care).
It's what he said he would do.
Originally posted by St Udio
i think his main campaign theme/promise was 'Hope-Change'...
not something concrete & tangible as you suggest.
Obama and Biden review the federal budget line by line and eliminate programs that don’t work or are unnecessary.
...
End Wasteful Government Spending: Obama and Biden will stop funding wasteful, obsolete federal government programs that make no financial sense. Obama and Biden have called for an end to subsidies for oil and gas companies that are enjoying record profits, as well as the elimination of subsidies to the private student loan industry which has repeatedly used unethical business practices. Obama and Biden will also tackle wasteful spending in the Medicare program.
Originally posted by centurion1211
The American socialists that helped elect Obama, I guess because they thought he shared their ideals, will surely be gnashing their teeth and wringing their hands over this news from the Associated Press.
AP Article
WASHINGTON (AP) — Pointing with concern to "red ink as far as the eye can see," President-elect Barack Obama pledged Wednesday to tackle out-of-control Social Security and Medicare spending and named a special watchdog to clamp down on other federal programs ...
So, under Obama it seems more and more likely that federal entitlement programs will shrink rather than grow as people that beleive in socialism would have hoped. And the future for another entitlement program - universal healthcare?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
We tried to tell you he wasn't a socialist, but you wouldn't listen.
I don't see universal health care is an "entitlement program", other than the "entitlement" one has as a member of a supposedly advanced society that supports its people's inalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Originally posted by sos37
I'm sure there are quite a few pro-socialists who voted for Obama hoping for free handouts after takes office.
Originally posted by Irish M1ck
reply to post by centurion1211
If by socialist you mean most of the rest of the industrialized world.
Originally posted by selfisolated
Here in Britain we have 'National Insurance'.
Social security, if you prefer.
Whereby anybody earning over a certain amount of money has a small amount taken seperate to their tax (it has a lower threshold than tax) to be contributed.
This pays for free healthcare for everyone (except certain Dental treatments and optical treatments), as well as being the pot for unemployment benefits, state pensions for anyone who needs it, and sickness benefits so that those unable to work through illness and injury can still have a half decent quality of life.
Its great
Originally posted by selfisolated
National Insurance contributions aren't really that big a dent in wages, as far as I've experienced.
The queues are sometimes long, and the doctors can be annoying, but from what I've heard private healthcare is only better in that the waiting lists are shorter and you can see the doctor for more time.
But its that expensive it seems far better to mere mortals who live week by week to stick with the NHS.
They've sorted me out every time theres been something wrong with me.
Originally posted by redled
Bit of a con, NI is used for everything now, but was the bedrock of the NHS. I think you Americans have to understand that instead of demanding our treatment at the exact moment we want, we British invented the queue, and are happy to queue fairly in them. Hence our NHS is not appalling, just appallingly slow, but you've got to wait your turn.
Smiley faces at the US.......
Originally posted by yeti101
I'm from the UK and think the NHS is great. Ive been in hospital 4 times with broken bones i was seen straight away, x -rayed and plastered within an hour
Originally posted by ZeroKnowledge
Actually i personally use the benefits of this system extremely rare, but i will never agree to give it up. Even though i pay for it using it or not. Cost is reasonable and it gives you great deal of security for old age/ accidents. It has its minuses too, but pluses out-weight it.
Originally posted by yeti101
well i think its a real shame for a country that produces so much wealth theres no free health care for its people. Im from the UK but i am entitled to free health care anywhere in the EU! and i actually used it in holland when i was in amsterdam ( long story it was a Sunday and no chemists open ended up at a hospital). Amazing! in a foreign country and getting free health care like that.
I think socially america is falling behind the curve. Maternity programs, college fees, affordable health care accepted indicators of how socially advanced a nation is. All worse in the states than they are in europe.
as people that beleive in socialism would have hoped