Kissinger: "Obama's 'task' is to help create a New World Order"

Kissinger: "Obama's 'task' is to help create a New World Order"

rawstory.com

President Nixon's Secretary of State, the aging Henry Kissinger, recently told CNBC that he believes the current world economic crisis is a "great opportunity" for President-elect Obama to help create a "new world order."

"What do you think the most important thing is for Barack Obama?" Kissinger was asked. "... If you had to say, this is going to be the country, or the conflict, or the place that will define the Obama administration, what would it be?"

*SNIP*

"I think that his task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period, when really a "New World Order" can be created. It's a great opportunity. It isn't such a crisis."

(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.youtube.com

[edit on 7-1-2009 by Conluceo]

[edit on 7-1-2009 by Conluceo]

[edit on 7-1-2009 by Conluceo]

Mod edit: Changed quote to match article. Please do not edit quotes.

[edit on 1/7/2009 by Hal9000]

Well That seems pretty clear to me. Henry Kissinger still holds some heavyweight influence on world matters. I believe it will all spill out in the open real soon

Btw...There is nothing wrong with your television set. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling transmission…

PS. this also includes video. above.



rawstory.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

[edit on 7-1-2009 by Conluceo]

[edit on 7-1-2009 by Conluceo]

Obama will be a great driving force to usher in the "New World Order." He's definitely a forward thinker. I remember him saying how he was surprised at how little debate goes on in Washington, which is probably why he chose such a diverse cabinet so as to foster the dialectic method:

The aim of the dialectical method is to try to resolve the disagreement through rational discussion,[5][6] and ultimately, the search for truth. One way to proceed — the Socratic method — is to show that a given hypothesis (with other admissions) leads to a contradiction; thus, forcing the withdrawal of the hypothesis as a candidate for truth (see also reductio ad absurdum). Another way of trying to resolve a disagreement is by denying some presupposition of both the contending thesis and antithesis; thereby moving to a third (syn)thesis or "sublation". However, the rejection of the participant's presuppositions can be resisted, which might generate a second order controversy.[7]

We really need a centralized government much stronger than the UN that enforce decisions on a Global scale. Imagine if every state in the US had an Army that had the propensity to attack other states in disagreement or set up trade restrictions themselves! It would be chaos just like it is now on a world scale. With a federated government like the U.S, there is basically one chief (federal government) and 50 Indians.

Right now the world consists of "Too many chiefs, not enough Indians" There are about 172 sovereign chiefs with their own tribes doing whatever they wish. We need to restructure the tribes, join them into less and less tribes, and employ only a few chiefs to instruct our little Indians in civilized manners of living.

It doesn't even surprise me that the NWO players are not trying to hide their moves anymore.

There it is, as plain as day, they've stated what they want to do and they'll do it. No matter what or who they have to trample on to get it done.

[edit on 7-1-2009 by tezzajw]

reply to post by logician magician


I disagree. The world is a scary messed up place for sure but putting that much power in the hands of so few people is much scarier.

Great fodder for my paranoid mind, just when I started to lose interest in conspiracy theories. The number of times this phrase is used by the political and economic elite. Good post but crap, now I'll be over analyzing things for days.

Here's the full version of the Kissinger interview in better quality than the previous video. It just amazes me how some are still in denial about what is to come.





Mod edit: Embedded video.

[edit on 1/7/2009 by Hal9000]

Originally posted by Winsor
reply to post by logician magician

 

I disagree. The world is a scary messed up place for sure but putting that much power in the hands of so few people is much scarier.

Exactly the point that goes against a nwo. The world needs opposing sides, just to keep the ultimate authority killing anyone they want. Plus the fact that they never want people to live there lifes, they want to control everything. Just getting into power to help your friends will do nothing for overall peace, thats why america and israel, cannot make peace.

[edit on 1/7/2009 by andy1033]

Henry Kissinger's great friend is Obama's foreign policy advisor: Zbignieuw Brzezinski. Both Kissinger and Brzezinski have worked with David Rockefeller for decades. That says it all.

It isn't hard to understand that Barack Obama is an NWO puppet, just like the rest of the POTUSes of last decades. Republican and Democrat.

Holy taken out of context batman!

How can he create something that has supposedly already been created???

Just because Kissinger said NEW WORLD ORDER does not mean it's part of the super powerful yet unknown entity that the tinhat crowd like to call the NWO


If that's the case, then Hulk Hogan MUST be the leader! and he'll be runnin' wild on you!







Brother!

Originally posted by logician magician
We really need a centralized government much stronger than the UN that enforce decisions on a Global scale. Imagine if every state in the US had an Army that had the propensity to attack other states in disagreement or set up trade restrictions themselves! It would be chaos just like it is now on a world scale. With a federated government like the U.S, there is basically one chief (federal government) and 50 Indians.

Right now the world consists of "Too many chiefs, not enough Indians" There are about 172 sovereign chiefs with their own tribes doing whatever they wish. We need to restructure the tribes, join them into less and less tribes, and employ only a few chiefs to instruct our little Indians in civilized manners of living.

That is some scary stuff man. In fact, one of the few things that scares me more than the NWO is people who seem to think that it's a good idea. Are you hearing yourself? A stronger central government?! You've gotta be kidding me. Centralization of power has lead to more suffering in this world than any other institution in human history. We need to decentralize power, not further concentrate it into the hands of an elite oligarchy. Let me ask your this: What is it you value more, order or liberty?

This seems to echo the Berlin speech by Obama where he talked about "Global citizenship". This has all been planned and can not be undone. Embrace the NWO!

Originally posted by Orwells Ghost

Originally posted by logician magician
We really need a centralized government much stronger than the UN that enforce decisions on a Global scale. Imagine if every state in the US had an Army that had the propensity to attack other states in disagreement or set up trade restrictions themselves! It would be chaos just like it is now on a world scale. With a federated government like the U.S, there is basically one chief (federal government) and 50 Indians.

Right now the world consists of "Too many chiefs, not enough Indians" There are about 172 sovereign chiefs with their own tribes doing whatever they wish. We need to restructure the tribes, join them into less and less tribes, and employ only a few chiefs to instruct our little Indians in civilized manners of living.

That is some scary stuff man. In fact, one of the few things that scares me more than the NWO is people who seem to think that it's a good idea. Are you hearing yourself? A stronger central government?! You've gotta be kidding me. Centralization of power has lead to more suffering in this world than any other institution in human history. We need to decentralize power, not further concentrate it into the hands of an elite oligarchy. Let me ask your this: What is it you value more, order or liberty?

I very much agree with you and things seem to evolving faster and faster... not a good thing at all. Giving a very small group of people the power to fully control is the world is an extremely scary idea. We can only pray this will never happen... I doubt it though. Personally, I think the plans have been made already a long time ago during Bilderberg meetings. One interesting thing I noticed, is that Bilderberg is not attended by Israelis. Would there be no place for Israel in a NWO? - just Euros and Ami's.

I answered in this thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

And from the original source:

"The phrase 'new world order' traces back at least as far as 1940, when author H.G. Wells used it as the title of a book about a socialist, unified, one-world government," writes Drew Zahn. "The phrase has also been linked to American presidents, including Woodrow Wilson, whose work on establishing the League of Nations pioneered the concept of international government bodies, and to the first President Bush, who used the phrase in a 1989 speech."

reply to post by Mdv2


Interesting point regarding Israel. I tend to believe that Israel and Zionism are merely a means to an end. There is no Zionist conspiracy per say, just one great "Illuminated" conspiracy of which Israel is currently a useful part. However, in the end there is no room for religion; it is too great a threat to those who would desire power over others. If Israel must be created and destroyed to bring about a new order then that is exactly what will happen.

Kissinger has always been one of the key players to keep your eye on. He is one of the most connected politically, he is in essence the Kevin Bacon of Politics and the NWO. This comes as no surprise. He does call a spade a spade.

Originally posted by TheBandit795
Henry Kissinger's great friend is Obama's foreign policy advisor: Zbignieuw Brzezinski. Both Kissinger and Brzezinski have worked with David Rockefeller for decades. That says it all.

Yep. The writing is on the wall.

Kissinger either slipped because of his age and said more than he ment to, OR he knew exactly what he was saying and there is a reason behind his saying it. That would mean that Kissinger isn't afraid of exposure - and that means the NWO is very far along. Either way, Obama is a Bildeberger tool. Kissinger just confirmed what we already knew.

Originally posted by FlyersFan

Originally posted by TheBandit795
Henry Kissinger's great friend is Obama's foreign policy advisor: Zbignieuw Brzezinski. Both Kissinger and Brzezinski have worked with David Rockefeller for decades. That says it all.

Yep. The writing is on the wall.

Kissinger either slipped because of his age and said more than he ment to, OR he knew exactly what he was saying and there is a reason behind his saying it. That would mean that Kissinger isn't afraid of exposure - and that means the NWO is very far along. Either way, Obama is a Bildeberger tool. Kissinger just confirmed what we already knew.

I bet it is the second. Like I said, things seem to be evolving very rapidly. Let's see what the coming 2-3 years will bring us. If this Bilderberg group is really so bad as we suspect them to be, then I really cannot believe that people such as our queen are in there... She is intelligent but naive? Or is just because her dad hosted all of this initially?

reply to post by Chadwickus


Well since you're on the subject, Wrestling's part to play in the NWO covert propaganda machine came from the WCW. They were the one's who introduced the NWO storyline with Eric Bischoff and the two characters that defected from the WWF. The WCW belongs to Ted Turner who is a well known Bilderberger. Perhaps the influence came from him?

I Really Thought anyone who talked about NWO was a serious Nut. But more and more politicians talk about it happening. But we all know a NWO wouldnt last that long. Someones gonna get pissed and have followers and break out. then over and over again. tll were back at seperate countries Not that bad.