It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

'Humboldt Transparency Project' Reveals Diebold, U.S. Federal E-Voting Scam

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 8 2008 @ 11:32 PM
link   

'Humboldt Transparency Project' Reveals Diebold, U.S. Federal E-Voting Scam


www.bradblog.com

With Trachtenberg's off-the-shelf hardware and open-source software, developed in a short time, and at no cost at all to the tax-payer, he has virtually on his own, revealed the federal e-voting system to be little more than a scam.
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.times-standard.com
www.mitchtrachtenberg.com
www.bradblog.com
www.bradblog.com

Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
Former Diebold Contractor Blows The Whistle On Election Manipulations
Diebold comes clean, admits voting machines are faulty
Secret Diebold Software Patch Resulted in Republican Victories



posted on Dec, 8 2008 @ 11:32 PM
link   

If Trachtenberg could develop such a system on his own, with no federal funding whatsoever, no proprietary software and simple, off-the-shelf scanners, such that it seems to have counted votes more accurately than the one developed for years by Diebold, at enormous tax-payer expense, why shouldn't every voting jurisdiction that insists on op-scan voting systems immediately sue Diebold (and the other companies) for fraud, breach of contract --- or anything else they can find in order to recoup the millions spent on these broken systems --- and immediately switch to the Trachtenberg system?

We hope Crnich, Bowen, and election officials around the entire country who insist on such systems will give that notion serious thought. Trachtenburg just proved how easily it can be done, even while proving, yet again, as the Times-Standard noted, that those of us who have been yelling and screaming about these matters for years were "right to make noise, and right to complain about [companies] that [have] been less than responsible in dealing with the problem."


This article hits about as hard as any e-voting scam article could possibly punch. Highly recommended reading!

It should be noted that bradblog discovers that Diebold has actually broken the law, by far exceeding voting machine error rates.

I dream of the day when e-voting is done live, with the results being tabulated on the web in real time, straight from the sources, with no intervention. Total transparency in code and accountability.

www.bradblog.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on Dec, 9 2008 @ 04:24 PM
link   
In a related story:

www.bradblog.com...

VIDEO: Outrageous Arrest of FL Election Integrity Advocate, Candidate Caught on Tape


Brodksy has an impressive record of finding serious problems with counting and election procedures in Broward County, which undoubtedly helped foster the animus from her opponent Snipes. Shamefully, as we pointed out in our original coverage, Brodsky is only the latest in a string of EI advocates around the country who have been arrested recently while trying to peacefully carry out public observation of our public elections.

Here now is the video tape of the incident that results in her arrest, as captured on a small flip camera provided by election watchdog organization VideoTheVote.org. The man seen on the phone, at the beginning of the tape, calling the police, is Snipes' deputy Fred Bellis. It's clear that Bellis, in cahoots with Snipes --- again, Snipes was Brodsky's election opponent --- clearly seems to have been choreographing the entire arrest.





I guess people just don't want to discuss this any more at ATS?




[edit on 9-12-2008 by TrueAmerican]



 
1

log in

join