It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by danx
How do you know Justice Thomas didn’t want to hear the case because of McCain’s situation?
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
What level of proof would convince you Obama is exactly who he says he is?
From what agency would said proof have to come in order for you to believe?
Obama himself produced his Birth Certificate. It's been available since June and it has been verified by a bevy of experts and authorities. Hawaiian authorities say it is genuine. You refuse to accept it. From what authority would you need to see this in order to do so?
Please, tell the truth. I want your honest answers. If you can answer these questions reasonably there can be an honest discussion. If you cannot, then there's no point and this thread should be shut down as a troll-fest.
Originally posted by kozmo
reply to post by ConservativeJack
Let's be intellectually honest here... His own grandmother said she witnessed his birth - IN KENYA. The Ambassador to the US, from KENYA, stated that Obama's birthplace - IN KENYA - is their biggest tourist attraction.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
THAT IS OBVIOUSLY NOT ENOUGH FOR YOU.
And that obviously wasn't enough to convince Thomas either, because he referred the case to conference. But of course, that means nothing.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Originally posted by danx
How do you know Justice Thomas didn’t want to hear the case because of McCain’s situation?
I don't. Anything's possible. But it appears to me that some element of the suit must have had merit for him to refer it to conference.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Originally posted by danx
How do you know Justice Thomas didn’t want to hear the case because of McCain’s situation?
I don't. Anything's possible. But it appears to me that some element of the suit must have had merit for him to refer it to conference.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
That's speculation.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
That's speculation.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
But it appears to me that some element of the suit must have had merit for him to refer it to conference.
Originally posted by ConservativeJack
You are the guy who claims Obama is a lying nutcase.
I am the voice of reason.
You are the crazy.
The Supreme Court is on MY side.
I never said you were racist I asked are you racist? Because WHEN the President was white NOBODY ever said he wasn't from America. Because white people think you have to be white to be American.
*SMACKS HEAD AGAINST WALL*
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Wow, so I am speculating when I assume that a case needs to have some merit before it is referred to conference? WTF?
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Wow, so I am speculating when I assume that a case needs to have some merit before it is referred to conference?
And BH, I don't know why you'd say that about me that you don't think I'd believe it even if the SCOTUS took the case?
Come on now, I am not that shallow. I have said many times that I'd be completely satisfied if:
1) The SCOTUS court ordered his vault copy.
2) They had it analyzed by forgery experts to assure its validity.
3) They wrote a formal request to the government of Kenya asking for verification that they have no record whatsoever of Obama's birth in Kenya.
4) The forgery analysis came back clean
5) SCOTUS proclaims Obama eligible.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Wow, so I am speculating when I assume that a case needs to have some merit before it is referred to conference? WTF?
I would have loved for this case to be heard, simply so I could put it to rest in my mind, not all of yours. And BH, I don't know why you'd say that about me that you don't think I'd believe it even if the SCOTUS took the case? Come on now, I am not that shallow. I have said many times that I'd be completely satisfied if:
1) The SCOTUS court ordered his vault copy.
2) They had it analyzed by forgery experts to assure its validity.
3) They wrote a formal request to the government of Kenya asking for verification that they have no record whatsoever of Obama's birth in Kenya.
4) The forgery analysis came back clean
5) SCOTUS proclaims Obama eligible.
Done. End of story for me. That would be enough.
Originally posted by nsaeyes
REGARDLESS of whether he was born in Kenya or Hawaii...IT DOESN'T MATTER!!! Why?
BECAUSE HIS MOTHER IS A U.S. CITIZEN!!!! Any child born to a U.S. citizen is automatically a U.S. citizen by birthright, regardless of where in the world the mother gives birth.
Are all of you people hung up on this issue serious? Don't just read the damn laws, understand what they mean.
Sorry for my tone, I just couldn't take anymore stupidity.
Originally posted by nsaeyes
REGARDLESS of whether he was born in Kenya or Hawaii...IT DOESN'T MATTER!!! Why?
BECAUSE HIS MOTHER IS A U.S. CITIZEN!!!!
During the Justices' regular conference, the Justices discuss the petitions, and grant certiorari in less than five percent of the cases filed. ... Before each conference, the Chief Justice prepares a list of those petitions he believes have sufficient merit to warrant discussion. Any other Justice may also add a case to the "discuss list";