It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mercenary2007
Child porn is any pic of an underage child with there clothes off. They could just be modeling, or performing a sexual act.
Originally posted by Mercenary2007
reply to post by Now_Then
under the law yes its child porn.
Child porn is any pic of an underage child with there clothes off. They could just be modeling, or performing a sexual act.
Originally posted by Harlequin
reply to post by Mercenary2007
amazing
Child porn is any pic of an underage child with there clothes off. They could just be modeling, or performing a sexual act.
i have a picture of my baby daughter , aged 10 minutes old , she is on her mother feeding and totally naked - so in your opinion i should be arrested and thrown in prison for saving such a tender moment.
Originally posted by Karlhungis
What about people with fetishes? Let's convict them too! Let's get serious here people, anything other than missionary style sex should be outlawed because it disagrees with my moral fiber. (sarcasm)
Originally posted by Mercenary2007
I'm going to assume that you made that card on your computer, If you did and if anything happens to your computer and you have to take it to a repair shop, or have a tech come to your house and work on it. just hope they don't find those pics on your computer. They will call the cops and you'll have to answer to them about the pics.
Originally posted by RFBurns
Isnt it about time for society to get over this need to see sexual explicit content be it cartoons or movies or pictures?
It is an example of how media has warpped the jelly minds of easily manipulated people.
Quite frankly, anyone who MUST see naked cartoon characters really needs some psycological help.
Something wrong up there in that brain bucket. (do I hear echo's?)
Cheers!!!!
Originally posted by Mercenary2007
Child porn is any pic of an underage child with there clothes off. They could just be modeling, or performing a sexual act.
Dude really get a clue!
Originally posted by RFBurns
Perhaps the judge was thinking about the community as a whole, and not just this one person's right to think nasty if he so desires. With the stats of abducted and sexually exploited children these days, I can see the position of the court on this matter.
What if this guy lived next door to you and you had kids?
Originally posted by Mercenary2007
i said under the law the pics he was talking about was child porn. and yes any pic of an underage child naked is child porn under the law. and don't be fooled by Jomina's post see they failed to mention that the pics had to be taken before 1995 to be exempt! and the children represented in those pics had to be over the age of 14! maybe he should have read 18 U.S.C. section 2257 and 28 C.F.R. 75
took the computer to a repair shop they recovered his computer went through the files saved on his hard drive and seen that pic and called the police on him. He spent several thousands of dollars fighting it in court before he was found not guilty.
Originally posted by angel of lightangelo
Originally posted by Mercenary2007
Child porn is any pic of an underage child with there clothes off. They could just be modeling, or performing a sexual act.
Dude really get a clue!
BUZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ WRONG!!!!!!!!
Not in the United States. Modeling is not pornography. Child porn is clearly defined as sexually gratuitis poses or depictions and or gratuitis shots of getatalia. Please look these things up before posting them as fact.
Want that clue back?
[edit on 8-12-2008 by angel of lightangelo]
[edit on 8-12-2008 by angel of lightangelo]