It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dooper
reply to post by skeptic1
If incest, bestiality, and all these things are so forbidden, and the analogy is that being gay is not illegal, then why does this gay marriage thing come up only now?
If it was such a "acceptable" thing, why in this country did it wait 200 years to come up?
Marriage for millennia has been between man and woman. Period.
You want civil rights? Get them another way.
But don't drag the institution of marriage down in the gutter just so this aberrant behavior can somehow become more socially "acceptable."
I see a lot of 'end times' threads, and if this spiral downward of our moral base continues, then, it just may be a good thing.
Zeus, while slow in reviewing his notebook, always checks.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Poor Grover's probably sitting there wondering why this has expanded into such generality on the issue, when really the issue is "The religious case for gay marriage."
Originally posted by dooper
Intrepid, you're again using a non-argument. You choose opinion, not teachings. If you don't believe the teachings, and instead select what you like and don't like, then according to the very scriptures, then while you may call yourself a Christian, you ain't.
Originally posted by dooper
You may have gay friends, and good for you. That's something to write home about. I'm sure momma's real proud.
I don't care what these abberants do in the privacy of their own homes. They can practice their lisps, break out the swiss cheese and gerbils for all I care. But keep it to themselves. Civil unions? Fine.
This is nasty business. No getting around it. It's abberant behavior. No getting around that either. Nice people? Who cares, because a lot of us don't give a rat's fuzzy pucker.
Originally posted by dooper
He's already said so. Very clearly. Remember, I and the Father are one?
And not everything Christ said was recorded in the New Testament.
And the fact that you aren't a Christian was already made known.
Originally posted by dooper
reply to post by skeptic1
You'd be surprised at what "rights" I would deny others. Bestiality is not to be allowed, and I don't care how "enlightened" I'd be if I'd just go along with the flow.
That thing about going with the flow. Soon you find yourself so far downstream, you can't find your way back.
You may have gay friends, and good for you. That's something to write home about. I'm sure momma's real proud.
I don't care what these abberants do in the privacy of their own homes. They can practice their lisps, break out the swiss cheese and gerbils for all I care. But keep it to themselves. Civil unions? Fine.
Marriage? Give me a break.
This is nasty business. No getting around it. It's abberant behavior. No getting around that either. Nice people? Who cares, because a lot of us don't give a rat's fuzzy pucker.
You can't take a racial misdeed and compare it to an abberation.
It's not healthy, it's abberant, hell, it's just twisted. And through their damned nastiness, a lot of innocent folks, including chldren caught a terrible disease and died. It appears it will practically wipe out Africa before it's over. Tell me it isn't nasty.
Originally posted by dooper
Intrepid, you won't honestly consider the Bible so our discussion is pointless, and I much rather go to other threads and converse with those who have a basic grasp of the topic at hand.
The Old Testament was given as law. If I were to sum up the Old Testament, I'd have to say it would say: Obedience.
The New Testament if I had to narrow it down was Forgiveness through obedience, enabled by the blood shed on our behalf.
Thus, I'm off this thread. It's a complete waste of time.
Until then, I could care less.
Originally posted by dooper
reply to post by skeptic1
Wasn't judging.
Dooper has asserted that you cannot pick and chose what you believe to be a Christian...
HOWEVER that is exactly what funnymentalists (and it doesn't matter what religion those funnymentalists are) do... they chose a version of their faith.... after all he could have been a Unitarian or Quaker as opposed to say a pentecostal or Baptist... and then pick and chose from the teachings....
I don't suppose he stones adulterers to death, or burns witches at the stake, or sacrifice a spotless lamb on an altar or have multiple wives or owns slaves....
.... I doubt that he follows the dietary laws in the Bible...
... and so many more... which if he were taking the Bible literally and following all of its laws and stipulations, he would be required to...
... In short he picks what he chooses to follow from both testaments and then has the gonads to lecture us about following God's laws.