posted on Dec, 6 2008 @ 04:25 AM
The African born in the United States are concentrated in management or professional and sales or office-related occupations. Of the employed
population age 16 and older in the civilian labor force, the African born are much more likely than the foreign born in general to work in management
and professional occupations as well as sales and office occupations (i.e. clerical/administrative). Additionally, the African born are less likely to
work in service, production, transportation, material moving, construction, and maintenance occupations than the foreign born in general (Dixon D,
2006). In the UK a study by Dr Yaojun Li, from Birmingham University, and Professor Anthony Heath, from Oxford University, found that Africans are
more likely to be in professional and managerial jobs than white British men, with a large proportion, about 40%, holding these positions (Li and
Heath, 2006).
BLACK AFRICAN EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR IQ:
The presented information above suggests that African born blacks residing in western countries as a group possess IQs that are between 5 points and a
full standard deviation (15 IQ points) above that of whites living in these countries (see, Gottfredson, 1998; Ostrowsky, 1999; Richardson, 2002;
Cross, 1994; Williams, 2005; Nisbett, 2002) - This is especially true for those in the United States and in the UK. One may also expect to find,
according to much of the corroborative literature that relates IQ with education, approximately twice the number of African born immigrants with IQs
in the 115 range, than among the general white American population (Gottfredson, 1998; Ostrowsky, 1999; Williams, 2005; Nisbett, 2002), and “more”
than twice the number of African immigrants in the 125 IQ range (see Gottfredson, 1998; Nisbett, 2002; The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education,
1999-2000).
For example, in the United States, African born blacks and their offspring have been reported to exceed American born whites in several socio-economic
indicators - particularly in the areas of educational attainment and occupational status - in ways that resemble the gaps observed between native born
white and black Americans, in the same indicators (Nisbett, 2002; Charles, 2007; Le, 2007; Le, 2007; US Census Bureau, Census 2000. "5% Public Use
Microdata Sample.").
Some advantages to using academic attainment comparisons for the analysis of major group differences in IQ in Western industrialized nations are that
they provide very big numbers, with sample sizes often in the hundreds of thousands, that are genuinely random; and consequently specific ethnicities
can be compared with statistical confidence. The differences in overall educational attainment observed between African born blacks in the United
States and native born white Americans are quite spectacular! Indeed, if one chooses to adopt the hereditarian thinking of Jensen (1998), Herrnstein
and Murray (1994) or Gottfredson (1998), these disparities become suggestive of underlying intelligence differences between the two populations; with
these differences in strong “favor” of African born blacks. Though higher cognitive indices are said by some to be predictive of more educational
achievements and more education predictive of higher intellectual outcomes (e.g., Brody, 1997; Ceci & Williams, 1997), so that there are reciprocal
relationships. Most who study African immigrants attribute their inclination toward academic attainment to be the result of positive cultural factors
(Arthur, 2000; Selassie, 1998).
In the United States today, most claims regarding intelligence differences between ethnic populations in relationship to IQ are based on statistically
derived data relating to scholastic aptitude tests and academic achievement (e.g. Flynn, 2002). Keeping this in mind, and acknowledging the superior
educational attainment of most African blacks in the united states (and elsewhere), it can thus be argued, because of their higher educational levels,
that they must also be expected to pass far more (in number), and more difficult scholastic aptitude tests, which would require higher level IQs (see
Gottfredson, 1998; Ostrowsky, 1999). Moreover, as whites on average do not, or are unable to attain the same levels of academic achievement within
these (their own!) institutional frameworks they must also, by racialist thinking, possess significantly lower cogitative indices on the group level
(e.g. Jensen, 1998; Gottfredson, 1986). In fact, attainment differences of these magnitudes would suggest that (American) whites are at an
intellectual handicap when matched against black African immigrants.
African born blacks residing in Western countries tend also to be concentrated in higher level professional occupations, which are considered by many
to be more cognitively demanding, requiring more intellectual ability (Jensen, 1998; Gottfredson, 1986; Herrnstein and Murray, 1994), than the average
occupations of either American or British born whites (Dixon, 2006; Li and Heath, 2006). According to IQ advocates and social Darwinists, alike, these
occupational differences should also indicate higher levels of intelligence among black African immigrants than among whites (e.g. Gottfredson, 1986;
Jensen 1998). In fact, as virtually all IQ tests in popular use today are designed specifically for the purposes of predicting academic success and
occupational status, it could thus be argued that the west’s hereditarian “Cognitive Elite” (discussed in “The Bell Curve”) are best
described as black men and women from Africa. That is, if we assume the outcome measure of IQ tests to be a truly independent measure, and that a
positive correlation between IQ tests and the criterion establishes predictive validity.
(CONT)