It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
My hubby works for a Hindu family as well, but they eat meat, so I don't understand, the family I know says that not eating meat is a Hindu 'rule'.
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
For example on the meat eating issue, there is a social stigma attached to eating certain meat (beef), but there is not definite answer about whether it is correct or not. This stigma was used to protect cattle, so that a dairy-based farming society could exist without the animal stock being wiped out. In today's world, this bears no importance and so many reformists (myself included) will eat beef. Yet the Rig Veda, which is the most ancient of the Aryan texts, even mentions beef consumption amongst the Brahmins as a ritual sacrifice.
Originally posted by Cythraul
I've always avoided stating that all religion is bad, preferring to more accurately say "all the Abrahamic religions are bad" - the big three - Christianity, Judaism and Islam.
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
It makes for interesting conjecture to think about what Britain and the British Empire would have been like without the influence of Christianity. Undoubtedly Britain came on leaps and bounds under Christianity, but I wonder if its a question of "despite" rather than "because of".