It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
posted by nh_ee
It looks like the airplane scrap found at aviation boneyards where they strip out the valuable components and parts and the fuselage is merely cut up into small pieces consisting of aluminum to be re smelted into recycled aluminum.
Just like a hollywood screen set. Another prop in the 9/11 Shock and Awe TV show.
posted by Throat Yogurt
how much would you guess that rather large piece of scrap weighs?
how many "perps" would it take to carry it out there?
how many people were out on the lawn that day?
How many people saw it getting placed there?
posted by 2PacSade
Couldn't the holes in the "N" piece be where the rivets pulled right through?
If the supports beneath the skin pulled away at a right angle then the skin would not be torn, and the holes elongated. They would be round for the most part.
posted by Throat Yogurt
how much would you guess that rather large piece of scrap weighs?
how many "perps" would it take to carry it out there?
Originally posted by SPreston
Nah. I don't think so.
posted by exponent
You posted this image, which clearly shows deformation around many rivet holes and shows some rivets still remaining in the holes.
Do you think that this debris was planted also?
Originally posted by SPreston
That very slight deformation is made by the punch press forming the holes. Tightened rivets leave a much more definite deformation of the aluminum.
Originally posted by exponent
Originally posted by SPreston
That very slight deformation is made by the punch press forming the holes. Tightened rivets leave a much more definite deformation of the aluminum.
Then why is there more deformation visible in the pictures of AA77 debris than there is in the AA587 picture? Is the AA587 debris faked or do you have any particular experience to be able to explain exactly how aircraft skin rivets are constructed and applied?
Originally posted by exponent
In the JREF thread, Mangoose also posted this image, from AA587:
Do you think that this debris was planted also?
posted by baffledon911
Im pretty sure that 911myths believes this is a cargo hold door, or some "door" (not passenger) to f77. Its listed under the "proof of f77" section.
posted by cashlink
My “opinion” is, this is a plant from an aircraft bone yard.
It does look like a piece of an airplane wing, however it cannot be part of flight 77 here is why, it looks to small to be a part of the wing and to small to be any part of the rudders or flaps. Further more there is nothing burnt on this piece of debris. Remember the wing is where the fuel tanks are. So let us say it was part of the wing of the plane and the plane slammed in the pentagon, first you will have an explosion on both wings. Oh ya! That means you will have severe fire damage on anything that was blasted away from the airplane on impact, and while pieces of airplane debris was been hurled to the ground, it would defiantly been on fire, infact it would have been soaked in jet fuel, that would mean the ground under the falling debris and around the debris would have been scorch or burnt.
Originally posted by SPreston
I have no idea if that alleged AA587 photo is faked or not. Perhaps the aircraft was carrying a load of new fuselage panels when it crashed. I'm not about to take the word of an Ilusionist JREFer on anything.
Do you still see your rivets sticking out of the holes on the alleged Flight 77 fuselage piece? No? Yes? You don't want to talk about it?
And while we are the subject, do you like the new official flight path over the Navy Annex and North of the Citgo and finally impacting on a big big bank? Doesn't that make your job so much easier?
Originally posted by tezzajw
What has AA587 got to do with a thread about AA77?
Please, try to stay on topic, exponent.