It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
reply to post by jamie83
Blacks voted for Obama because he is black.
Women will vote for McCain/Palin because she is a woman.
There are millions more white women than blacks.
McCain will win because white men and women voted for him.
Now come on - why steer off that honesty course?
To make such a bold statement above is saying that blacks and women - collectively - lack the intelligence to base their decision on more than skin color and sex of a candidate.
Originally posted by Sonya610
The choice for VP was meant to influence disappointed Hillary supporters, and I do believe it will work.
Originally posted by Unit541
Oh wait, Obama was never on the PTA...
Originally posted by RRconservative
Not thrilled with the Palin pick...I would have preferred Romney or Jindal...but I would rather have an inexperienced VP than an inexperienced President.
McCain is a one term President and had a chance to pick a VP that would successfully run for the Republicans in 2012. He failed. Now in 4 years, the Republicans have to start all over again.
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
Jessica Simpson is a very attractive woman - if she was running for President, would you vote for her because she's "hot"?
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
now that the Obama campaign has MORE experience - suddenly experience doesnt matter any more.
Andy, you realize Washington is filled with many EXPERIENCED politicians? That does not make them good...
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
24 hours ago - experience was all that mattered to the OP and his comrades
today - experience doesnt mean jack *snip*
so - do i realize it? Yes
but im not the one saying experience means anything, i am merely throwing this argument in their face.
Originally posted by Fathom
bottom line McCain/Palin have the woman vote and the conservative base behind them now...too bad suck it up. game over you lose,
quit your crying.
Originally posted by jamie83
By the time the election is over, I think Palin is going to prove herself to be a remarkable person and candidate in her own right. She may very well outshine McCain and Biden before she is done.
Originally posted by Journey
Well said, and I have to agree. I live in that small city in Alaska, and it's name is Wasilla. Palin has done an excellent job, both as the former mayor of my city, and as my states head.
She even passed an energy assitance bill, which all of us Alaskans will get 1200$ in addition to the dividend fund which will be about 2000$- both payed to every resdent of Alaska in just a few weeks.
Sarah has done, and will continue to do, an excellent job.
Originally posted by TheRooster
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
Lets do a campaign comparison, shall we?
Sarah Palin : Elected Mayor of a small town (population: 5,470) In the year 1996. She remained mayor until she was elected Governor in 2006. 2008-1996 = 12 years experience.
Barack Obama : Became an Illinois Senator in 1997. 2008-1997 = 11 years experience.
Wiggin, thanks for doing the simple math. The bottom of GOP ticket has more experience than the top of the Dem ticket. Yeah, voting for BHO (when you look at your math) makes all the sense in the world! NOT
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
reply to post by TheRooster
Nice conservative tactic:
Ignore my entire post, omit the passages that make you look wrong - and then go with it
The title of the thread is Palin vs. Obama, who has more experience
and when its proven that obama has more experience, suddenly it doesnt matter?
The moronic masses strike again!!
Congratulations - you bathe in ignorance.