It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by davion
The fact that he even has to win over the "bitter" Clinton voters just belies their intelligence, in my opinion.
How childish can you get?
Boohoo your candidate wasn't nominated, now you're going to systemically ruin everything for your entire party because your ego was butthurt.
Originally posted by davion
The fact that he even has to win over the "bitter" Clinton voters just belies their intelligence, in my opinion.
How childish can you get?
Boohoo your candidate wasn't nominated, now you're going to systemically ruin everything for your entire party because your ego was butthurt.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by davion
The fact that he even has to win over the "bitter" Clinton voters just belies their intelligence, in my opinion.
How childish can you get?
Boohoo your candidate wasn't nominated, now you're going to systemically ruin everything for your entire party because your ego was butthurt.
these types of statements are sad to see, because voters have the right to vote for anyone they want, or vote for no one at all
why do you think everyone has to tow the party line all the time? me personally, i wish we did away with political partys altogeather, and just had canidates, and just voted
no political parties involved would be a nice, refreshing change
look at what the party has done to you
your mindset thinks purely in a left vs right paradigm
and then you talk down on a "block of voters" because they dont wanna vote the way u want them to
its a real shame indeed it is
thats why we should seriously get rid of all political parties and just let the people vote for canidates
that way people will have to find a more decent, logical reason to vote for a particular person, because they can no longer hide in the ignorance that is "towing the party line"
Originally posted by jamie83
Your comments are typical of the arrogance that's pervasive in the Obama campaign, which starts at the top and works its way down.
So if somebody doesn't support Obama they are not intelligent? Give me a break. Did you ever consider that people have good reasons not to support Obama based on his thin experience and left-leaning policy proposals?
Originally posted by davion
So then what was your implication of "bitter" Clinton supporters? You're flip-flopping more than McCain. So you're all for calling them bitter but if anyone says their bitter they are ignorant? What
I don't understand the logic behind supporting a Democrat like Clinton, being rah-rah-rah for her ideals and against McCain, and then once Clinton falls by the wayside suddenly McCain's ideals seem so much better even though they are in complete opposition to what Clinton's goals were that you originally agreed with.
I call them how I see them and that's being childish.
Originally posted by jamie83
It's very simple to understand. McCain is experienced, strong on defense, and consistently pro American. Obama is none of those things.
Obama's goal is to disarm America. Obama is inexperienced. Obama has consistently ridiculed and derided not only America as a country, but Americans as well. We drive SUVs, we eat what we want, we cling to our religion, we don't like people who don't look like we do, etc., etc., etc.
What is childish is expecting people to fall in lock step behind Obama and then insult them when they don't.
Now that her supporters actually might turn this election in one of two directions suddenly it's "not very nice" to slam them.
The national tracking polls have Obama up by an average of 6%. Gallup has him up 8% while Rasmussen Reports has him up 4%.
Originally posted by davion
If that's the case then why weren't Clinton's supporters drumming for McCain in the first place? Oh that's right because they lost the General Election.
Originally posted by Cyberbian
I took your advice and did the math.
More precisely I looked it up.
www.usaelectionpolls.com...
The national tracking polls have Obama up by an average of 6%. Gallup has him up 8% while Rasmussen Reports has him up 4%.