It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ALLis0NE
Wow, that is the worst CGI Ive ever seen passed as real.
Not only does the far away photo not match the close up photo, but the people on the close up photo are fake and they don't even have real shadows, and the ones that do have shadows, they are fake. All fake pixelation.
I can't believe anyone is falling for this one.
Hey OP what is your source? I would like to know.
This one is a hoax, and should be marked in the title. I will show evidence if needed.
Originally posted by Techsnow
Can anyone elaberorate on this?
I remember seeing a show on history channel once in which scientists tested "nodes" of the crop and said that their complete genetic structure had been altered and claimed it was impossible unless a gigantic microwave were beamed at the corn.
In several technical papers, W. C. Levengood purports to show that "Plants from crop formations display anatomical alterations which cannot be accounted for by assuming the formations are hoaxes."[1] Unfortunately, there are serious objections to Levengood's approach. First of all, while he uses various control plants for his experiments, nowhere in the papers I reviewed [1,2,3,4] is there any mention of the work being conducted in double-blind manner so as to minimize the effects of experimenter bias. (As one "cereologist," the Earl of Haddington, said of another laboratory that claimed to detect different "energy levels" between crop-circle and non-crop-circle areas [a concept that appears to have begun with dowsers], "When they are not told which sample came from a Crop Circle and which from a heap of grain in my back yard they are either unable or unwilling to give a result."[5])
Word reaches us via Saucer Smear that Roswell researcher Kevin Randle has recently called into question the doctorate of Dr William Levengood (pictued right), whose research into biophysical changes in plant samples taken from crop circles is held up by many in the crop circle research community as "proof positive" that crop circles are not man made.
In response to Randle's allegation Levengood said that in reality he has a "PhD equivalent" from the National Academy of Sciences (NAS). Which all sounds perfectly reasonable, but... when NAS was contacted, they said that they were not a academic institution and don't issue "degree equivalents" of any kind, which leaves "Dr" Levengood somewhat in the lurch!
Originally posted by TheOneEyedProphet
It may seem extraordinary, too good to be true, and sometimes it is.
This is the wake up call of the universe....
Originally posted by mclarenmp4
Are you being serious? So what you are saying is that all the people that took the photographs, have been to the site & even reported on by local press are all in on a CGI hoax?
Originally posted by mclarenmp4
If you are then i'm sorry but you're nuts. That would be a bigger conspiracy than the actual crop circles. Why don't you start a thread on how a CGI crop circle is being hoaxed & submit your evidence.
I live in Buenos Aires Argentina and I always visit your web site. For the last 7 years I’ve been studying the Mayan culture. We are a group of eight and we get together every week to study. A few months ago we noticed that some crop circles contain numbers referred to the Mayas. But our surprise today is beyond anything we could have dreamt.
The circle which appeared today below White Horse Milk Hill Stanton St Bernard with an eight figure has a unique message. There are 21 circles on each side and 9 in the center ring. The circles appear to follow a pattern in size which made us think of Phi. So we did this: 21*1.618039 = 1596
Why is this so important? Because there are only 1596 days left before the end of the Mayan Long Count which ends on December 21st. 2012!!
TERESA BOND LANDAJO