It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Grey Magic
I am sick of all the wars.
Originally posted by cruzion
What ever your feelings about war, there is no doubting is a pretty effective piece of technological engineering.
Originally posted by pluckynoonez
Yay! New ways of killing people! Humanity is coming along just fine! I can't wait to see the aftermath of this weapon used on women and children!
Originally posted by Grey Magic
One picture says all...
Originally posted by pluckynoonez
Originally posted by cruzion
What ever your feelings about war, there is no doubting is a pretty effective piece of technological engineering.
Again, you missed the point. Our existence on this planet will not last; as long as things of this nature are created, especially when people like yourself laud how great they are. Shocking and awful I say, of everybody romancing WMDs. And let's just say that, weapons of mass destruction...who's the "terrorist" now?
I saw a documentary a while ago, I can;t remember the title, but it talked about MSM and how they romance military weaponry to the point where it dovetails the propaganda they are trying to disseminate. Free your minds! This romance is spawned in hell!
Originally posted by pluckynoonez
reply to post by rogue1
Yeah, and people don't drive vehicles, robots do. Come now, what time is it? Wake up a little earlier to nab plucky...otherwise, step off.
[edit on 19-7-2008 by pluckynoonez]
Originally posted by Iblis
Heavier, less-effective [One bomb per six tanks? Seems like a roll of the dice] and fewer bomblets is not what I'd call 'better', and seeing as we're basing 'they got their first' off their word that it was in service several years before ours, despite being announced that they had it the same year ours entered _production_ seems a tad silly.
Originally posted by Wembley
Originally posted by Iblis
Heavier, less-effective [One bomb per six tanks? Seems like a roll of the dice] and fewer bomblets is not what I'd call 'better', and seeing as we're basing 'they got their first' off their word that it was in service several years before ours, despite being announced that they had it the same year ours entered _production_ seems a tad silly.
Check the facts. How many actual kills do you get per CBU-97?
Also their is more siphisticated, with one version having a MMW sensor as well as IR. As for dates, there were a lot of indications that this preceded the US weapon, as it's based on an earlier Russian missile warhead.
Fourty targets. And if they fail to find one, they self-destruct fifty feet above the ground. Anything else?