It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by polomontana
Complex,
Again you miss the ball.
Originally posted by polomontana
I can prove that you don't exist....Prove me wrong.
Originally posted by polomontana
What does bigfoot being a myth have to do with the price of tea in China?
Originally posted by polomontana
I'm skeptical of bigfoot, but I can discuss these things in the context of reason and logic.
Originally posted by polomontana
Pseudoskeptic feel they have to inject their belief on the subject of bigfoot in order to "bring some reality to the debate."
Originally posted by polomontana
If you want to debate wether bigfoot exists, then start a thread about it.
Originally posted by polomontana
They are not comfortable in their beliefs so they want you to accept their view. This is why they want these threads to descend into a debate about the existence of these things.
Originally posted by polomontana
"Lol, this read exactly like this too me. "Could this as yet unproven myth actualy be this unproven myth?" See what I mean? Let's prove one or the other or both or something lol! This actualy came up in the 70's if I am remembering right. It came up about bigfoot and ET when no one had nothing but "pics" and stories of both these "boogie man deals".
Originally posted by polomontana
You can't debate a pseudoskeptic, because they don't want to debate. They want to make a statement that belittles everything so that they can feel better about there beliefs. I just call them on it.
Originally posted by polomontana
you want people to discuss these things on your terms.
Originally posted by polomontana
I will continue to call out people who are insecure about discussions that speculate and talk about things that they might not agree with.
Originally posted by polomontana
This board is for ideas about things you may not agree with.
Do you or Vance know what board you are on? It's called ABOVE TOP SECRET. People here discuss different ideas and different possibilities about varius subjects.
Originally posted by polomontana
You should just shut the board down if we have to discuss everything in the context of what you and Vance deem is real.
Originally posted by polomontana
This happens alot on here and I think it's importanant to highlight the difference between skepticism and pseudoskepticism.
Originally posted by polomontana
A skeptic will say:
"I don't think Bigfoot is an extraterrestrial. If he exists, then he's would be a creature that's part of the evolutionary tree."
Originally posted by polomontana
The debate is about, Could Bigfoot be an Extra-Terrestrial?
Originally posted by Swingarm
About 70 % of the surface of the the globes land is unsurveyed.
Originally posted by TallWhites
To those who say a skeleton of a dead Bigfoot has never been found, I heard biologists say they never encounter dead Grizzly bear skeletons either, in 30 years of roaming the forest.
Originally posted by polomontana
I was researching about Vimanas for another thread and I ran across this.
Some believe that Vimanas were actually U.F.O.'s.
It said this:
Also in the Ramayna is the account of one of Rama's comrades, the King of the Apes. This King of the Apes could evolve into a giant or shrink to a midget at will. He's also a brilliant and fearless pilot of a powerful flying machine of some kind.
www.thelosthaven.co.uk...
This is a story that goes back to 300 B.C..
[edit on 16-7-2008 by polomontana]
Originally posted by TallWhites
In my field guide for aliens book there's a species that closely resemble those statues on Easter Island.
Originally posted by TallWhites
I wonder if they perhaps were visiited by aliens, and assumed they were their Gods