posted on Jul, 14 2008 @ 02:40 AM
The Wikipedia article
Safety of the Large Hadron Collider now contains a
summary of some of the basic safety arguments of the organized safety opposition, after a long battle with CERN supporters to fight censorship of
these concerns.
The concerns are not just from
legal action and from what is raised in the
media as the article still
tends to imply. The safety concerns are lead by world recognized, credible scientists.
Dr.
Otto Rossler is an eminent award winning professor of theoretical sciences and a significant contributor to Chaos Theory. Professor Rossler's
research indicates that safety has not been reasonably proven, and
danger is very
plausible.
Published peer reviewed
papers from science professors that question one of the of the primary safety
arguments (Hawking Radiation) are still censored from the article. A 2004 Delphi study showing
up to 50%
doubt among physicists polled is still censored from the article. (
Physicists do have reasonable doubt about Hawking Radiation, contrary to
what the article implies).
From the Wikipedia article
Safety of the Large Hadron Collider:
Concerns raised in the media
Nuclear physicist Walter L. Wagner has argued that if Micro black holes are produced at the LHC, they might not decay as predicted by CERN, since
Hawking radiation is not an experimentally-tested or naturally observed phenomenon and might not exist.[8][22]
Professor Otto Rössler has stated that micro black holes created in the LHC would grow exponentially, accreting the Earth in 50 months to 50 years,
and he has sought scientific debate on his research[23] before the LHC particle collisions begin.[24]
----
A number of scientists are very concerned, and papers challenging safety arguments related to neutron stars and cosmic rays are currently in
progress.
Learn more at
LHCFacts.org or
LHCDefense.org