It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Hehe.
Thank you, somebody had to put him in his place. Streetlight, give me a break. That's some low-grade disinfo.
Originally posted by Sunsetspawn
ArMap, where did you get these "larger" files?
The UFOs on The Lizard King's photobucket account are 125Kb
Your EXIF data is from files that are well over 200Kb
It was the 11th to me, I live in Portugal.
Also, the date of your post is the 10th, but the EXIF files last date of modification is the 11th.
Now I understand that the actual act of copying the file will alter this date, however, you inserted this information into your post later. I'm just covering all of my bases as the fact that I cannot view this EXIF data for myself is bugging me.
Originally posted by meatballxl5
Great photos Lizard King, how come you didn't post them sooner?
Looking forward to seeing some suggestions on this.
Originally posted by shauny
its clearly swamp gas mixed with mars or venus
Originally posted by tep200377
Originally posted by The Lizard King
reply to post by ArMaP
Thanks, ArMap. It's always good to have someone around who is tech savvy.
Well, I dont know about that. Armap just bustet your whole thread.
the image was taken with 16 seconds shutterspeed.
You said it was moving! Well, if it was moving, it would have made light tracks on the image. It hasn't. You lie, case closed..
Edit: nice post GEL , I didn't mind go to page 2 since ArMap already posted the EXIF data. There is actually nothing more to discuss in this thread. Not only does the OP lie about the image, its allso a very common effect that all in this forum should be aware of now!
[edit on 11-7-2008 by tep200377]
Originally posted by Jinni
Originally posted by tep200377
Originally posted by The Lizard King
reply to post by ArMaP
Thanks, ArMap. It's always good to have someone around who is tech savvy.
Well, I dont know about that. Armap just bustet your whole thread.
the image was taken with 16 seconds shutterspeed.
You said it was moving! Well, if it was moving, it would have made light tracks on the image. It hasn't. You lie, case closed..
Edit: nice post GEL , I didn't mind go to page 2 since ArMap already posted the EXIF data. There is actually nothing more to discuss in this thread. Not only does the OP lie about the image, its allso a very common effect that all in this forum should be aware of now!
[edit on 11-7-2008 by tep200377]
I knew it was a slow shutter speed right away! Damn it, why do people post so much crap (ref OP)? It's hard to find the real deal anymore!