Doctors Cure Skin Cancer Patient!!!!!!!

Originally posted by Quantum_Squirrel
i know what your all saying about doctors and cures , i am still skeptical of a mass medical conspiracy to withold certain cures from the world

1, The hypocratic oath must mean something to these people.
2, They have cured plenty of diseases in the past eg small pox .
3. When they eradicate diseases new ones always mutate/appear so i can't see them worried about the future of the medical proffession not having a job i just don't see it people always need looking after?
4.from my position in the UK where the national health has to pay for these cures it would be more cost effective to cure conditions rather than providing heavily expensive medication to customers ( tax payers expense) for 10.20 or 30 years of thier life ? the former has to be cheaper.

No doubt.

Where do you think the Vaccine for Cervical Cancer came from?

People who think the medical community would sit on this are just morons.

The medical community has TONS to make off of this. For example

1. Patient has cancer
2. Patient BUYS Remedy
3. Patient goes on to live a regular life, so they can still buy more VIAGRA ASPIRIN VICADIN etc


The medical community stands to make so much more from curing cancer than it does from supressing it, because it means people will live longer and they will then be purchaing more meds in general.

Come on people, get a clue.

Originally posted by Sestias
I'm sceptical, because it's my understanding that cancer in the lungs is incurable, but the New England Journal of Medicine is not known for sensationalism. I sincerely hope it's true, and that the cure can be repeated for others. If so, it will be the greatest medical achievement of our time, and maybe in history.

I think what you don't understand is that cancer is different based on where it starts, not where it ends up.

For example, Testicular cancer which makes it to the lungs is COMPLETELY different from Skin Cancer that makes it to the lungs, which is COMPLETELY different from cancer that start in the lungs AKA Lung Cancer.

I'm not an M.D., but this technique sounds like it could be very useful in treating many other diseases. I'm surprised no one else seems to be suggesting that. Although, I'm not saying it's some kind of panacea for all disease. Still, it makes me wonder if this could be used for far more than just a cure for cancer.

reply to post by d11_m_na_c05


what are the adverse effects? bad temper, dermal necrosis, tooth discoloring/decay, increased breathing and heart rate, fatal sensitivity to sunlight, brain damage that can result in loss of speech or cognitive ability, desire to bite/eat other people. Other symptoms may include dizziness, drowsiness, and decreased libido. Those who have compulsory habits such as gambling should consult their physician.

reply to post by an0maly33

what are the adverse effects? bad temper, dermal necrosis, tooth discoloring/decay, increased breathing and heart rate, fatal sensitivity to sunlight, brain damage that can result in loss of speech or cognitive ability, desire to bite/eat other people.

LOL!

That was my first thought too upon reading the OP. I AM LEGEND!

Anyway, I'm not sure about there being a conspiracy to suppress cures. Yet, I'm not sure that there isn't. It really strikes me as strange that we haven't cured anything since small pox (was polio before small pox? I don't know.) Regardless of what has been cured the bottom-line is we have all this intelligence, research, and technology and yet we haven't cured more than 2 or 3 illnesses? (Please, correct me if I'm wrong, I WOULD LOVE TO BE WRONG HERE.)

I agree folks. These are the guys who spend years coming up with "cures" that are really expensive treatments using patented technologies and chemically derived drugs.... that may or may not be effective. To really CURE disease, you have to first eliminate the toxins from the body, calm the mind, and boost the immune system. The human body is amazing, and given the right conditions, I believe that anything can be cured. So they need to spend their vast monies researching the right conditions. To me, this cure only seems like some good PR for cloning. Companies like Monsanto want to make money cloning vegetables, but first they have to get people to believe that Cloning is Our Friend (insert bad 50's propaganda vid here). Hopefully these are new points, I only skimmed through some of the replies.

Originally posted by an0maly33
reply to post by d11_m_na_c05

 

what are the adverse effects? bad temper, dermal necrosis, tooth discoloring/decay, increased breathing and heart rate, fatal sensitivity to sunlight, brain damage that can result in loss of speech or cognitive ability, desire to bite/eat other people. Other symptoms may include dizziness, drowsiness, and decreased libido. Those who have compulsory habits such as gambling should consult their physician.

Even tho its from Legend, i will answer your what are the side effects question,

As it uses your own immune system to combat the cancer, injecting you with your own cells hence making a negative reaction highly unlikely i would say.

My reply to a message from U2U:

Please help me to understand this
Thank you.

I believe that everyone has their own cure, based on their own life habits. No 0ne single cure will work for everyone because everyone is unique. But in the same sense, everyone is similar. We all use the same technology, we all eat the same foods, from the same places, cooked the same way, we all breath the same air, smoke the same herbs, drink the same poisons.... without knowing exactly what is happening on the nano-scale. But we all uniquely do the above at different rates. Some people use technology more than others, some drink more or less poison then others, and intake more or less then another person. So there is very many variables that differ from person to person.

You see, you can find videos all over the net about people who have rid themselves of their cancer just by eating apple seeds, or getting certain nutrients that the body may or may not need. This indicates that cancer is nothing more than a toxic intrusion, much like a splinter is an intrusion to the skin.

Cancer is a problem that was induced by lack of certain chemicals, or an abundance of certain chemicals. You need to find a steady center or balance in your diet. Eating a wide range of foods, instead of sticking to a single range of food (american, chinese, mexican, etc.).

Everything you eat, is used to build you. When you eat fruit, it becomes a part of you. When you eat meat, it becomes a part of you, when you eat/inhale toxic man made chemicals, it becomes a part of you. When you lack chemicals you need, and when you have extra chemicals you don't need, you get cancer. You need to balance your diet, and watch for the chemicals that scientific study has not fully understood (yet).

Doctors don't know everything. They give a drug that they found may help, but they aren't 100% positive themselves. Half the time you ALWAYS have side effects to drugs, because they are doing more then what they claim, not less. And the effects are not always good, some might be...

The cure for cancer is within you. 0nly you know what your diet is lacking... 0nly you know what toxins you put in your body... 0nly you can know how you feel, good or bad. 0nly you know what is good for you.

Listen to your body, it has built in sensors. It will tell you what parts of your body hurt, it will indicate to you a good or bad feeling depending on the trigger. When you sneeze/cough, your body trying to eject something out from your nasal/lung area that your body doesn't like. When you regurgitate, your body is telling you "get rid of whatever you are eating because its bad", or you had too much of it. Your body waste, is also a good indicator of whats going on inside the body. If you have a lot of waste, that means you may not be feeding yourself the right chemicals, and everything in that waste your body doesn't want. Or it could indicate you aren't chewing your food good enough so your stomach doesn't work as effectively, and you can't process all your food fast enough.

People need to stop relying on someone else to diagnose them, they need to learn to diagnose themselves. Figure out what our body is telling you.

If you already have cancer, figure out how you got it, where it started, and work with that information. Where ever that cancer is, for instance like lung cancer, is a strong indication to what you need to do to cure it.

Don't stick to a scheduled diet, eat what your body craves, and when it craves it. 3 meals everyday is sometimes to much... only eat when your body is telling you to.

Would you change the oil of a car 3 times a day? No, you change it according to your habits, your temperatures, your distances. When you finally do change the oil, the oil is a great indication of how the motor is running. Dirty oil means toxins reached the interior of the engine (cancer), smooth normal oil means all systems seem to work fine, and thick burnt oil indicates the engine could be running hot.

Does this make sense to you?

[edit on 20-6-2008 by ALLis0NE]

Yoiu know what guys, Cancer is one of the worlds biggest killer, and if they have only saved 1 life with this treatment, then it has to be classed as a Major Breakthrough. One is always the start of something big. I take my hot off to these science guy's, they have never given uop the bottle even though they are way under funded. They make it their lifes work to try and cure this evil killer, and get no thanks for it. God bless you guys, and keep up the great work.

you think the earlier post i made is a snake oil seller he doesnt even charge and he has shown everyone how to make it them shelves and there are 0 side effects

reply to post by dean007


no i think if someone claims to cure cancer they should get it medically verified and distrubuted to the world.. even if he is not selling the idea , if it works its his duty to get it checked properly

These cloning stories are making the rounds more and more. Sooner or later this will be the norm in the medical world. Being treated with your own cells will be like taking a medication. This stuff is like Star trek.

Hemp Oil, the stuff that looks like tar, is supposed to cure cancer. Of course big oil has their hand in everything. If this is true it could be a very good reason of why it is illegal. It kind of makes you wonder.

Originally posted by nexusmagazine
I know of someone recently, with terminal lung cancer, who cured himself over a six week period. He took one teaspoonful of bicarb soda, in a glass of water, three times a day, for six weeks. He coughed up god awful amounts of multi-coloured 'stuff' for the last 4 of the 6 weeks - but said it was worth it. Given that he was told to 'put his affairs in order', he is a pretty happy chap.

Duncan

Yeah, baking soda is supposed to be a cancer killer. According to some theories the only reason it is not used to treat cancer officially is due to that it cannot be patented and also very cheap to produce. After all those billions of dollars spent investing in cancer research it would be a major pain to explain that simple baking soda kills cancer cells.

I think it was explained that the baking soda reaction causes high oxygen levels within cells, which cancer cells cannot handle and destroys them. I think i read on wikipedia that there is one american scientist team researching this at test lab level currently with a special government permit.

Originally posted by ravenflt

Originally posted by nexusmagazine
I know of someone recently, with terminal lung cancer, who cured himself over a six week period. He took one teaspoonful of bicarb soda, in a glass of water, three times a day, for six weeks. He coughed up god awful amounts of multi-coloured 'stuff' for the last 4 of the 6 weeks - but said it was worth it. Given that he was told to 'put his affairs in order', he is a pretty happy chap.

Duncan

Yeah, baking soda is supposed to be a cancer killer. According to some theories the only reason it is not used to treat cancer officially is due to that it cannot be patented and also very cheap to produce. After all those billions of dollars spent investing in cancer research it would be a major pain to explain that simple baking soda kills cancer cells.

I think it was explained that the baking soda reaction causes high oxygen levels within cells, which cancer cells cannot handle and destroys them. I think i read on wikipedia that there is one american scientist team researching this at test lab level currently with a special government permit.

Hey if this is true that baking soda does this there's got to be some news thread that covered it. Can you pull up the name of the lab and scientists involves as well as the permit? Even though their work is ongoing they should be able to give insight before hand.