It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bitbeam
humans are so polarized now that it's hard to understand what could bring us back together as one peaceful and God loving society, "hard to understand" of course does not mean "impossible to understand" as always answers have been given to us if one is willing to seek
Originally posted by ClintK
What Fox News did calling Obama's wife "Baby Mama" is exactly why they are not taken seriously as a news organization. It is inexcuseable and totally deliberate bias, which in journalism school we were taught is a clear sign of a news organization lacking integrity, and probably isn't really a "news" organization at all. It appeals to people like the OP, who clearly is filled with hate. It is nothing but name calling. That isn't what journalists are supposed to do. What Fox News did was incredibly unprofessional.
Originally posted by ClintK
This is not inconsistent with Fox. They identified Obama as a Muslim.
Originally posted by jsobecky
reply to post by ClintK
I'll say to you the same thing I said to the other member who implied this: It's OK for Michelle Obama to use this language, but not OK for anyone else to use it? After all, she set the tone and tenor of that type of ghetto talk back in 2004:
www.rushlimbaugh.com...
Originally posted by jsobecky
No they didn't. They reacted to internet accusations that Obama was a muslim. Then they brought guests on from both sides of the aisle to debate the question. Then they left it up to the viewer to make the decision. Sorry if they wanted you to think for yourself instead of spoonfeeding you.
Originally posted by Perplexed
And to me this is a good thing. professional journalism today is a joke... Btw.. Fox news beats every cable news organization out there today. To say that no one takes them seriously is a lie... CNN is getting killed by Fox and I doubt they don't take that seriously... MSNBC, CBS, ABC, ect... They are all taking a huge hit... What do you people want? Katie Couric and Dan the "News Man" Rather?
Originally posted by Perplexed
The free market is taking care of the news folks. Its not the journalists that set the standard. It’s the consumer and consumers trust Fox more than anyone else and I laugh when people say they are a joke.
Originally posted by Perplexed
As far as Obama and his prissy wife goes is there nothing that they say or do that we are able to criticize? People are so afraid to open this guy up to questions and to me that sounds pretty fascist... Seems no better than Bush and with this communist Obama it will be worse...
Originally posted by Jadette
The problem is, Fox doesn't just 'lean' to the right. It's outrageously biased in ways that other new agencies simply are not.
Originally posted by ClintK
What Fox News did calling Obama's wife "Baby Mama" is exactly why they are not taken seriously as a news organization. ...
This is normal for Fox, which is why they're not taken seriously in professional journalism.
TELLS IT LIKE IT SHOULD?????
Originally posted by Danbot
reply to post by eric52081
What a complete idiot this guy is.
Black people in America have been downtrodden, hung from trees, executed by police and generally had a ridiculously hard time of it. Oh! one tenuous link with a preacher who has more right than most of us to bare ill feeling against the white race and suddenly we have the right to call black people racist?
I know that 51% of the American population is beyond hope but the other 49% need to start taking issue with pathetic ignorant arseholes like the guy who posted this crap.
Sincerely,
Danbot
McCain doesn't pick up on Michelle Obama joke
So a man finally got a question into McCain and he had a very different sort of question.
The questioner noted that he had been educated at Princeton and Harvard and made more than $300,000 a year.
"How can I be proud of my country?" he asked.
Get it — he was mocking Michelle Obama and her statement earlier this year that her husband had for the first time in her life made her proud of her country.
Well, McCain either missed the joke or decided to ignore it and answer the question literally. I think it was the former because the individual asking the question had a thick accent that sounded to be either Indian or Pakistani, perhaps suggesting to McCain a recent immigrant grappling with America's image abroad.
"I’ll admit to you that it’s tough, it’s tough in some respects," McCain said, seeming to lend credence to Michelle Obama's observation.
McCain said America needed to be "more humble, more inclusive."
He observed that one of the ways to be proud of the country was to look at our history — and the sacrifices U.S. troops have made abroad.
McCain let his questioner follow up and the individual repeated, but didn't clarify, his line.
In closing, McCain said he was proud of America in part "because of you and what you've been able to achieve and accomplish."
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by TruthWithin
I could go into this further but this is derailing the topic at hand and the point of this thread is the unreasonable assumption by fox news that everything uttered out of the mouth of Obama's wife is racially motivated and that she is some sort of a biggoted monster.
What is odd is that no quotes have been put forth by the OP to defend his position on the subject. Instead this thread has been changed to relay the paranoia that this board has repeatedly spewed that our government is going to be taken over by in my opinion a retarded monkey.
The issue at hand is Obamma's wifes supposed racial remarks and how evil she is. Perhaps the OP would like to elaborate on the evils this woman has reportedly spouted.
And also TruthWithin the subject of NPSD 51 would be an excelent one for a debate between us if you are so inclined.
Originally posted by ClintK
Originally posted by jsobecky
reply to post by ClintK
I'll say to you the same thing I said to the other member who implied this: It's OK for Michelle Obama to use this language, but not OK for anyone else to use it? After all, she set the tone and tenor of that type of ghetto talk back in 2004:
www.rushlimbaugh.com...
You didn't even read the very article you cited here, did you? Rush Limbaugh said, of the "whitey" tape rumor, "nobody on our side said they had ever seen it." In other words, YOU are saying Michelle Obama used these words --when even your own pundits are saying, uh, we never said anything about that.
Originally posted by jsobecky
I'll say to you the same thing I said to the other member who implied this: It's OK for Michelle Obama to use this language, but not OK for anyone else to use it? After all, she set the tone and tenor of that type of ghetto talk back in 2004
Originally posted by jsobecky
No they didn't. They reacted to internet accusations that Obama was a muslim. Then they brought guests on from both sides of the aisle to debate the question. Then they left it up to the viewer to make the decision. Sorry if they wanted you to think for yourself instead of spoonfeeding you.
Originally posted by jsobecky
The rest of your post is, well, just a rant based upon your mistaken interpretation.
Originally posted by ClintK
What debate could there possibly be? Obama said he was a Christian. So the assertion here is that he's secretly a Muslim? You're hilarious. So is Fox. Again, they never retracted this asertion that he was a Muslim. Period. This is an historical fact.
And you know what? It's also completely irrelevant to the topic. Your reasoning seems to be that because there's a rumor Michelle Obama said "whitey" a few times on a tape, that makes it okay for a news organization to make a racist slur against her. The lack of logical reasoning is breathtaking.
Originally posted by ClintK
Calling someone "my baby's daddy" is ghetto talk? Uh, no. Complaining about white folks and calling them "whitey," that's ghetto talk. When you label something improperly, which you did, it's inevitable you will be misinterpreted. Women of every race often refer to the father of a child to whom they gave birth as "my baby's daddy." I mean your mischaracterization of what she said is breathtaking.
Originally posted by jsobecky
No they didn't. They reacted to internet accusations that Obama was a muslim. Then they brought guests on from both sides of the aisle to debate the question. Then they left it up to the viewer to make the decision. Sorry if they wanted you to think for yourself instead of spoonfeeding you.
Originally posted by ClintK
That's not a retraction.
Originally posted by ClintK
And you know what? It's also completely irrelevant to the topic. Your reasoning seems to be that because there's a rumor Michelle Obama said "whitey" a few times on a tape, that makes it okay for a news organization to make a racist slur against her. The lack of logical reasoning is breathtaking.
Mistaken interpretation of what?