It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We all know that the building was powered down over the weekend before the attacks
On the weekend of 9/8,9/9 there was a 'power down' condition in WTC tower 2, the south tower. This power down condition meant there was no electrical supply for approx 36hrs from floor 50 up. I am aware of this situation since I work in IT and had to work with many others that weekend to ensure that all systems were cleanly shutdown beforehand ... and then brought back up afterwards. The reason given by the WTC for the power down was that cabling in the tower was being upgraded ... Of course without power there were no security cameras, no security locks on doors and many, many 'engineers' coming in and out of the tower
GW: How do you know that there was no electricity from floor 50 up, if Fiduciary Trust was on much higher floors -- starting at the 90th floor?
SF: I can't absolutely verify that there was no power on lower floors ... all I can validate is that we were informed of the power down condition, that we had to take down all systems and then the following day had to bring back up all systems
SF: All systems were shutdown on Saturday morning and the power down condition was in effect from approximately 12 noon on Saturday September 8, 2001
GW: When did it end?
SF: Approximately 2PM on Sunday 9/9.
In all of this time this guy has stuck to his story. I believe him.
Marvin Bush, the Presidents younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided Security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines and Dulles International Airport.
According to its present CEO, Barry Mc Daniel, the company had an ongoing contract to handle Secrurity at the WTC up to the day the buildings fell down.
Originally posted by ThroatYogurt
reply to post by goose
No way / no how
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
Completely feasible...NOT.
Originally posted by goose
If those in power controlled security then it would have been easy as far as getting in to the buildings to get the buildings ready for demolition. As Sayzaar has already mentioned the security was taken over by a firm Marvin Bush was involved with.
Maintenance as in cleaning crews did not have to access these parts of the buildings I noted, the areas that were shown in the picture was for maintenance of phone lines, not areas it would have been neccessary to clean up or be in very often.
As for K9 units, weren't they abruptly removed from working the WTC on Sept. 6, 2001?
Also the surveillance tapes and maintenance logs were not recovered from the WTC. See links below
Originally posted by driveshaft08
According to its present CEO, Barry Mc Daniel, the company had an ongoing contract to handle Secrurity at the WTC up to the day the buildings fell down.
If those in power controlled security then it would have been easy as far as getting in to the buildings to get the buildings ready for demolition. As Sayzaar has already mentioned the security was taken over by a firm Marvin Bush was involved with.
It also gives you plenty of time to send people inside walls and between floors and rig everything.
If you read my post I said Marvin Bush was iinvolved with the firm in charge of security, not in charge, there is a difference
People who have done demolition for a living have looked at the videos of the WTC 7 and said it was a demolition job. I believe them and I believe what is clearly shown in the videos
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
People who have done demolition for a living have looked at the videos of the WTC 7 and said it was a demolition job. I believe them and I believe what is clearly shown in the videos
And I can dig up plenty of demolition experts that say that in no way, shape or form were the Towers a "demolition job"