It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Now you're scaring me! If the majority deemed it moral to kill a certain ethnic group... it's okay for that marjority to enforce it's morality on the rest of the people? (Extreme example)
Originally posted by Valhall No...it isn't...not when you are the majority.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Now you're scaring me!
If the majority deemed it moral to kill a certain ethnic group... it's okay for that marjority to enforce it's morality on the rest of the people?
(Extreme example)
Originally posted by Joseph Knecht
Mr. Simple Truth:
I have to disagree with you. What you are saying is predicated on YOUR own belief that their is an absolute truth. Your belief may be based on anything concievable. That still makes it YOUR belief! This is exactly what is so devisive about christianity. YOU DO NOT HAVE A MONOPOLY ON THE TRUTH. You may have faith, logic, reason, etc.. But the 'truth' is, in all actuality: you have absolutley no idea whether you are right, wrong, or somewhere in-between. Is this so hard for you to deal with?
I said I believe in a God. You immediantly turn that into the fallacies of my belief pertaining to God. Who the hell are you?
I will continue this debate for as long as necessary, but please understand the inherent difficulties in dealing with an absolutist.
Originally posted by Joseph Knecht
Not to leave out number 5.
5. Reality; actuality.
often Truth -That which is considered to be the supreme reality and to have the ultimate meaning and value of existence.
What is CONSIDERED to be the supreme reality and ultimate meaning of existence inherently presupposes that there is an ultimate reality. Who or what considers this? Someone's belief.