It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Alright Place your bets the Time has come.

page: 1
<<   2 >>

log in


posted on Dec, 28 2002 @ 04:00 PM
Come on everybody, Everyone know that the united states is going to get hit with small pox and is going to blame it on saddam. When is it all going to happen come on place your bets.


posted on Dec, 28 2002 @ 04:15 PM
Falcon if the United States was to be infected with Small pox and could prove it was done by Saddam. Bagdad would be a memory and something only discussed in History books.

posted on Dec, 28 2002 @ 04:39 PM
I think its propaganda into scaring us and making US citizens support the further efforts on the war on terrorism.

posted on Dec, 28 2002 @ 11:41 PM
I think if that did happen most Americans (who are not afraid of anything by the way) would respond by demanding George bush resign. If at the very least he did not drop 200 megatons of explosives on Iraq.

And soon afterward elect someone who would, he could even make it a campaign promise

And be assured of a second term

posted on Dec, 29 2002 @ 12:07 AM
place ur bets on britain aswell cause were stock pileing on the vaccine

[Edited on 29-12-2002 by SE7EN]

posted on Dec, 29 2002 @ 02:17 PM
So far there has been an astonishing lack of evidence against Iraq. I cannot find even a good rumor that Iraq possesses small pox.

There was an attempt to blame the anthrax attacks on Iraq, but tests proved that the high grade anthrax originated recently in our own military labs. This can only have been an inside job and a conspiracy by our own black operations people to create a pretext to attack Iraq.

As a foot note for this try www.

posted on Dec, 29 2002 @ 09:22 PM
My bet is: "not for another 10 years, if then."

posted on Dec, 29 2002 @ 10:38 PM
I agree with Byrd, I highly doubt that a massive portion of our country will become infected with the small pox virus. If they get lucky, maybe in some small spots but I that will be it. When the first person tests positive for the small pox virus Bush will have everyone getting the vaccine. As for him resigning is there is a small pox outbreak don't count on it happening.

posted on Dec, 29 2002 @ 11:30 PM
Iraq doesn't have the capacity to launch a large scale bio attack on the US. It would require tons of agent, and advanced large scale delivery techniques. Attacks would have to happen in multiple areas to be effective.
Small scale attacks could be possible but would be quickly contained.
So, as for a smallpox attacked launched by Iraq, it is highly improbable. Iran or North Korea have a greater capacity to mass produce these agents. That's who are the mian threats.

posted on Dec, 30 2002 @ 02:12 AM
It wont happen.

posted on Dec, 30 2002 @ 09:44 AM
is a number of small outbreaks, similar to what happened to the Anthrax. Not that they wouldn't try to do more, just that that's all that would be successful. Also, I really doubt that it would be able to be solidly (at least in the world's eyes) tied back to Saddam.

Hey, for the Nostradamus fans, see what you get when you hold saddam up to a mirror? Hehe...not good...

As far as time frame, I'm betting not till late spring, early summer, but that also depends on the impending war...

posted on Dec, 30 2002 @ 03:56 PM
Um........even if the US does get attacked with any kind of disease, they will make it sound like it's the end of the world and they have to do something about it. Just like WTC, they made it sound like one strike on the buildings was sooooooooooo devestating that they just had to ruin other peoples' lives for money. Basically the same thing IF it does ever happen. Unfortunately.

posted on Dec, 30 2002 @ 05:52 PM
The Catalyst, what the hell are you talking about? In case you didn't know the 9/11 attacks were devastating as two of the worlds greatest buildings are now gone, the historical pentagon was partially destroyed and 2,800 innocent lives are now gone because of it. If I remember correctly on 9/11/01 and or the day after the President made some pretty strong speeches about how we would get revenge on these terrorists, I don't remember him talking about the end of the world. "Ruin other peoples' lives for money", man you really need to stop speaking out of the wrong end of your body.

posted on Dec, 30 2002 @ 09:11 PM
Listen 'The Catalyst'. The strike on the WTC was Very Very devistating. If you are American British Swedish or Aussie like me you would and should be damb upset.
I remember the first time I saw it live, My father asked me, walking into the room, "What Movie is This?". I responded Dad it's no movie. We were shocked. We are still emotional now nearly 2 years after.
Just think before you write something Mate!

posted on Jan, 2 2003 @ 04:24 PM
I have a idea for anyone that wants to pick a date how about anyone that gets the wrong date has to buy the simon cd that is offered on this website. It will go to help keep the site up.

It should get those people who have not supported this site in one way or another to send off and get somthing in return.


posted on Jan, 2 2003 @ 04:32 PM
Yeah 9/11 was no big deal.

People from around the world were killed that day.People that went to work to support themselves,and families.I think if you lost a family member,you would have a different view.

posted on Jan, 2 2003 @ 04:55 PM

Originally posted by TheCatalyst
Um........even if the US does get attacked with any kind of disease, they will make it sound like it's the end of the world and they have to do something about it. Just like WTC, they made it sound like one strike on the buildings was sooooooooooo devestating that they just had to ruin other peoples' lives for money. Basically the same thing IF it does ever happen. Unfortunately.

I can be pissed at you for being so flip - it was my business, my front yard and most importantly my colleagues that were critically damaged or gone to me forever from 9/11.
On the other hand, I can't fault you for being aware of this grand misdirection that our rightful response turned into and how it makes a mockery of the lives that were lost & will be lost in the name of corporate imperialism.
It's a synergy I don't enjoy - having 20 something Nephews shipping out, being angry & distraught that good people I used to shoot the breeze with, some I even got them their jobs at Morgan/Dean Witter....are no longer here, looking at my 2002 be a fraction of my 2001 earnings.
And then reading this:

Yeah, more terror attacks will come.....just look for the politics & the declining poll numbers to dictate when.

posted on Jan, 2 2003 @ 07:46 PM
Listen 'The Catalyst', you've pissed alot of people off by your comments.
I don't think that these people hate you, I don't. I just think that you have to think before you type something up and post it!
Just be a little more careful in how you pick your words and I think an appoligy is in order.

posted on Jan, 3 2003 @ 01:30 PM
Falcon sadly enough you are correct, there will be future biological attacks cause by the us infiltrators in government whom
want martial law.

what is the way to enforce more laws for the taking of personal privacy?


But i cant believe all the people in here who dont see this, this is supposed to be a conspiracy website where people
know about secret governments and their plans.

evil is real and it thinks of these plans before it ever happens, 9/11 ws planned and so is the next attack, just by the few infiltrators in gov.

Sometimes i think this site has secret agents on here who try and cover for their plans, literally.

who knows though, sadly enough more stuff will ahppen in the name of enforcing martial law and dictatorship.

9/11 was aa huge deal considering the buildings that were taking out and was not just another bad event.


posted on Jan, 3 2003 @ 02:11 PM

Originally posted by Truth

But i cant believe all the people in here who dont see this, this is supposed to be a conspiracy website where people
know about secret governments and their plans.

I am of the firm belief that 9/11 was allowed to happen.
Read the link I posted.

".......At the time, Hitler had a problem. Based on the success of the Nazi party in the previous election, Hitler had become Reichskanzler, or Prime Minister, but he lacked a majority in both the government and the parliament. Having no intention of playing second fiddle to his rivals, a coalition of moderate parties, he needed a decisive victory in the March 5 election. He also was uncomfortable with the democratic process, and wanted to proceed directly to Nazi supremacy and dictatorship.

Hitler's solution was to eliminate the Communist party and its 100 deputies, which would give his Nazis a majority in the remaining parliament. By ensuring that van der Lubbe succeeded in destroying the Reichstag, he could pronounce the fire a Communist conspiracy. By the next morning he had secured the signature of the aging President, von Hindenburg, on legislation that changed Germany from a democracy to a tyranny. The one hundred Communist deputies were arrested, civil rights were abrogated, and the country embraced Hitler as its Leader.

In mid 2001, the Republican government in the United States was having a problem. It was seen as merely presiding over a recession, having accomplished nothing of significance, and it faced an uphill battle in getting the largest peacetime defense budget increase approved in Congress. The corporate sponsors of the Bush administration were, no doubt, getting impatient: the stocks of the defense industry were still losing their value, and, lacking a credible enemy, there were serious reservations in Congress against spending more on defense.

During the weeks prior to September 11, 2001, Muslim terrorists made it known that they were going to hit some notable landmarks in America, and hit them hard. These boasts surfaced on the Internet, much the same as van der Lubbe's bragging in the Berlin beer hall. Much as in Germany in the '30s, help was forthcoming, and for the same reasons.

Fully aware of the threat to the nation's aviation from slipshod security in US airports, the government did nothing to improve it; in fact, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) top management intentionally hid reported security weaknesses.

On the morning of September 11, four large passenger jets with full fuel tanks went off course over the US Northeast, and ceased communicating with Air Traffic Control. Flight controllers overheard sounds of a struggle from the cockpit of one plane. Passengers made cellular phone calls from two of the flights, reporting that the planes had been hijacked. Normally, when something like this happens, the US Air Force, which has fighter jets ready to intercept troubled or suspicious civilian aircraft on short notice, begins escorting the offending plane, and, if necessary, forcing it to land, within ten minutes of being alerted by the FAA.

But that day, each of the four planes was allowed to continue off-course for as long as half an hour or more. Finally, after the first one had hit the World Trade Center in New York, a couple of fighter jets were scrambled from Boston, which ensured that they couldn't reach New York before the second impact. "

The planes, and the stand down of protocol, is too obvious a point to ignore.

*****By the way, the quote in my signature file is from a retired NYFD Captain I know who saw things play out, was rebuffed on his inquiry, and walked away from his job disgusted.......he said this on the one year annivesary, with still no 'truth' breaking surface******

top topics

<<   2 >>

log in