It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by biggie smalls
reply to post by crmanager
I seem to remember Iran has the 2 most powerful allies aside from the US. Guess who?
I seem to remember Iran has a vast reserve of oil, and if pressed, could seriously mess up our fuel supply.
I also remember that we're still bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan with no end in sight.
Originally posted by biggie smalls
reply to post by crmanager
I seem to remember Iran has the 2 most powerful allies aside from the US. Guess who?
I seem to remember Iran has a vast reserve of oil, and if pressed, could seriously mess up our fuel supply.
I also remember that we're still bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan with no end in sight.
The National Iranian Oil Company expects oil revenue to reach a record of more than $52bn in the current financial year. The problem is that much of the state's revenues are draining away in subsidies to support a largely closed economy lacking foreign investment. One of the most pressing challenges to the government lies in the country's lack of refined fuels.
The Islamic Republic produces 44 million litres of refined fuel a day which provides less than half of domestic requirements. It is a vulnerability that Washington has indicated it will use as a lever in its efforts to curb Iran's nuclear programme.
Iran’s oil consumption totaled 1.6 million bbl/d in 2006. The Iranian government heavily subsidizes the price of refined oil products which has contributed to increased domestic demand. Iran has limited refinery capacity to produce light fuels, and imports much of its gasoline supply. Iranian domestic oil demand is mainly for gasoline and automotive gasoils, but domestic demand for other oil products are declining due to the substitution of natural gas. However, it is an overall net petroleum products exporter due to large exports of residual fuel oil. Oil export revenues represent the majority of Iran’s total exports earnings, but the country suffers from budget deficits due to a growing population and large government subsidies on gasoline and food products. In 2005, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimated that energy subsidies accounted for 12 percent of Iran’s GDP, the highest rate in the world according to an International Energy Agency (IEA) study.
Originally posted by biggie smalls
reply to post by yellowcard
They don't need refineries, they have all their neighbors to do that for them.
I've posted this map many many times before. Notice how the Iraq oilfield is the same as the Iranian oil field.
Well guess what. No more Iraqi oil if Iran decides as such.
Iran doesn't need oil as much as you'd think. They have huge renewable energy resources: wind, solar, hydroelectric, cogeneration, geothermal, and biodiesel. A boycott would not hurt them in the same way a boycott of the US would.
renewable energy in Iran
It's my opinion that the world has just about had enough U.S. Military for this decade. I just don't see the world standing by while we aggressively attack yet another country. The U.N. stepped aside as we defied their wishes when we invaded Iraq. Don't expect them to do the same next time.
Originally posted by yellowcard
A boycott? I'm talking about a blockade, if we blockade their gasoline supplies they are dead.
You can't fly a jet without jet fuel, you can't run a tank without diesel, your economy can't transport food without gasoline. Oil prices aren't directly tied to oil supplies hence the crack spread so $200 oil wouldn't exactly cripple the U.S. economy. We would completely destroy Iran, it's not even an argument. It might take 6 months, but without an occupation victory would be historically swift for the U.S.
Originally posted by biggie smalls
Originally posted by yellowcard
A boycott? I'm talking about a blockade, if we blockade their gasoline supplies they are dead.
And why would be blockade Iran? What have they done? Give me one good reason we should do this. Oh, because they threaten Israel after Israel threatens them. Both sides are slinging crap at each other, and neither side is helping so don't bring that up. I'm not interested.
You can't fly a jet without jet fuel, you can't run a tank without diesel, your economy can't transport food without gasoline. Oil prices aren't directly tied to oil supplies hence the crack spread so $200 oil wouldn't exactly cripple the U.S. economy. We would completely destroy Iran, it's not even an argument. It might take 6 months, but without an occupation victory would be historically swift for the U.S.
As $115 dollar per barrel prices are currently crippling the US economy, I don't see how $200 per barrel wouldn't. Care to enlighten me on this one?
Why would we want to destroy Iran in the first place, because we can?
If the US does invade Iran, we couldn't claim victory unless we occupied. And that would be a surefire way of completely dismantling the US military and flushing the economy down the toilet.
Originally posted by yellowcard
Again, I'm not saying we SHOULD invade Iran, I'm sick of people putting words in my mouth. The POINT is that if we did invade Iran without occupation, we would beat the hell out of them. I'm really getting tired of people assuming that just because someone knows the U.S. can win a war means that we actually want to go to war.
I've been a Ron Paul supporter, I don't support any of these wars or nation building, but given a situation I'm giving you the result. $120 is not crippling the economy, it just coincides with a credit market fallout, a housing bubble and a falling dollar. It may slow the economy, but $120 a barrel in my eyes is doing the U.S. good, finally the markets will demand alternatives. All it's doing now is squeezing profit margins.
Originally posted by yellowcard
The POINT is that if we did invade Iran without occupation, we would beat the hell out of them.
Originally posted by tyranny22
Originally posted by yellowcard
The POINT is that if we did invade Iran without occupation, we would beat the hell out of them.
We might eventually win (what's victory) without occupation, but we'd suffer many more casualties in a much shorter time than we have in Iraq.
This is a country that continually holds annual Anti-American rallies as a sort of national holiday. Don't think that if the Ayatollah and the President told the nation to pick up arms that any able body, man, woman, or child wouldn't be fighting along side each other against our troops.
Basically, you're looking at another urban warfare senerio but instead of a broken up Iraqi military .. it'd be roughly a couple million vs. however many we were able to draft (500,000?).