It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
A confidential draft agreement covering the future of US forces in Iraq, passed to the Guardian, shows that provision is being made for an open-ended military presence in the country.
The draft strategic framework agreement between the US and Iraqi governments, dated March 7 and marked "secret" and "sensitive", is intended to replace the existing UN mandate and authorises the US to conduct military operations in Iraq and to detain individuals without time limit.
The authorisation is described as "temporary" and the agreement says the US "does not desire permanent bases or a permanent military presence in Iraq". But the absence of a time limit or restrictions on the US and other coalition forces - including the British - in the country means it is likely to be strongly opposed in Iraq and the US.
Iraqi critics point out that the agreement contains no limits on numbers of US forces, the weapons they are able to deploy, their legal status or powers over Iraqi citizens, going far beyond long-term US security agreements with other countries. The agreement is intended to govern the status of the US military and other members of the multinational force.
Again, no time limit as that would "ensure failure for our troops." No Mr. Bush, you're the one who ensured their failure.
Originally posted by biggie smalls
McCain's "100 years of war" wasn't so far off
Secret US plan for military future in Iraq
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
Originally posted by biggie smalls
McCain's "100 years of war" wasn't so far off
100 years of occupation or until the oil wells run dry - whichever comes first
As long as they keep it in the ground the last oil on earth might indeed be in Iraq in 100 years, long after the rest of the world runs out. And by then Iraq might be some of the most valuable real estate on earth.
[edit on 8-4-2008 by In nothing we trust]
Originally posted by N_15L_S01We are sitting on the Iraqi treasury and Saddam's wealth, this war is not costing us a dime. The Iraqi's are taking long term loans for our involvement and role in securing Iraq and they will pay for it in gold. Without this war the economy would be even more depressed then it's current state. There would be an immediate liquidation of many American industry employees and the foreclosure rate on homes would jump a few percent, as well as the unemployment rate.
Originally posted by N_15L_S01Because the Israelis and arabs/persians (same thing) cannot play nice, we have to be involved militarily in that region of the world. If we could drill domestically we would have hundreds of years of oil and plenty of money to transition into fusion/particle, nuclear, solar, fuel cell or oceanic current technologies. Though at this time it would be costly and the dumbass libs and environmentalists wont go for it. It was attempted for 20 years, now it has fallen by the wayside, but we wouldn't be in Iraq if American companies could drill domestically. I am not oppossed to new technologies, but realistically they must be funded somehow, how better to accomplish this task then to use our own oil money? Kuwait, Quatar, UAE and several other non-militant/extremist nations are using their currency for these tasks. Why doesn't America? Instead we quarrel over who's right or wrong for starting a war we can't control or disolve. We won Vietnam militarily and we've won Iraq militarily shut up and deal with it.
Originally posted by N_15L_S01Americans are imbecile to think that we wont be in Iraq for the next 50 years, we are still in Japan, but they own/control their own country. We are still in Germany, again they own/control it. Don't be so naive and take a history lesson will ya?
President George W. Bush will make a brief speech about the troop mission in Iraq Thursday after his top general and ambassador in the war-torn country testify to Congress, the White House said Tuesday.
"The speech will be broad," she said, adding that it would be a daytime speech and that the White House would not request airtime from television networks.
"It will be remarks that cover a range of issues in regards to the way forward in Iraq, taking in account all that he's heard from General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker, as well as the experts at the State Department, at Department of Defense," Perion said.
The U.S. general commanding the Iraq war called Tuesday for an open- ended suspension of U.S. troop withdrawals this summer, asserting that an overly rapid withdrawal would jeopardize recent security gains.
Gen. David Petraeus told a Senate hearing that he recommends a 45-day "period of consolidation and evaluation" once the extra combat forces that President Bush ordered to Iraq last year have completed their pullout in July. He did not commit to a timetable for resuming troop reductions after the 45-day pause.
The top military commander in Iraq faces a disapproving public and the next commander in chief during congressional testimony that could help shape November's campaign.
All three presidential candidates - Sens. John McCain, Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama - sit on committees that are to receive status reports Tuesday on the war's progress from Army Gen. David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan C. Crocker.
Originally posted by N_15L_S01
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
Originally posted by biggie smalls
McCain's "100 years of war" wasn't so far off
100 years of occupation or until the oil wells run dry - whichever comes first
As long as they keep it in the ground the last oil on earth might indeed be in Iraq in 100 years, long after the rest of the world runs out. And by then Iraq might be some of the most valuable real estate on earth.
Liberals like you have rejected the notion of drilling domestically, though we sit on some of the largest known reservoirs in the world.
Originally posted by N_15L_S01
Half of the reason we find ourselves influenced by what happens in the Middle East is because we subscribe to their oil. Liberals like you have rejected the notion of drilling domestically, though we sit on some of the largest known reservoirs in the world.
Originally posted by Double Eights
Not costing us a dime? Why is it estimated to cost us THREE #ING TRILLION DOLLARS then? You are clueless.
1. We didn't win Vietnam in any way, shape, or form.
2. We have the technology, where we wouldn't need oil. However, no one in this administration will use that technology, and the last person who tried to make it mainstream, was assassinated.
3. Yes, the war is about Oil, but not because we need it to survive. The war is about Oil because Bush, Cheney, and Co. are getting filthy rich off it.
Originally posted by N_15L_S01Americans are imbecile to think that we wont be in Iraq for the next 50 years, we are still in Japan, but they own/control their own country. We are still in Germany, again they own/control it. Don't be so naive and take a history lesson will ya?
[We didn't invade Japan and kill off their people, and then put military bases around to control the area.
[We didn't invade Germany and kill off their people, and then put military bases around to control the area.
We did invade Iraq and kill off their people, and then put military bases around to control the area.
One of these things is not like the other.
I don't know where you got your information that there is no domestic drilling. Where I live there is not an idle rig to be found. Permium Basin, Four Corners, Montana, Wyoming are all experiencing an oil drilling boom.
How can I believe anything you say if you can't even get this one simple fact right?
^^^and that's just one company. There are currently 100s of oil companies all over west of the Rockies in operation.[/qoute]
There are about 12 big oil companies in the U.S.; the tear one cateagory sells their unused resevoirs to smaller companies at a discount rate, hence discount gasoline. It's like day old bread. If you wanted clarification there it is. If you don't believe my assesments of the Middle East I can care less. I felt generous and good resources; CIA factbook, Global GDP Index and Stratford Intelligence report- it's an independant company with political and strategic assesments on global situations.
[edit on 11-4-2008 by N_15L_S01]