It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by intelgurl
The September 2007 raid by Israel on the suspected Syrian nuclear site was as stealthy as it gets
Originally posted by dbates
According to this Debka article the Syrians don't know if the intruding aircraft came in from the East, West, or South. Basically they're in the dark as to how the Israeli (Western) aircraft were able to pull off this manuver. Syrian pride in their newly purchased systems was rapidly deflated with their inablility to do anything to stop the intruding aircraft.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by Trance Optic
USAF has got their sac on tight.......
I used to believe that, untill I bothered to do he research, as far as I'm concerned the U.S. has/is using "Media-Trickery" to make it seem as so, I suggest you read posts by a person called "StellarX" his posts are U.S. Military/Gov officials addmitting Russia had the advantage in MANY ways during to cold war, BTW Russia WarHeads have a 250 metter (760) feet CEP, well a 450kt-25MegaTon warhead dropping 760 feet away from the target is going to destroy hat target and EVERYThing for the next 5-8 miles, so Russia's nukes aren't THAT "inacurate" besides what the "mediatrickerists" like you to believe, just read StellarX's posts you be SHOCKED at just what U.S. Citezens have been lied to about the socalled "most-powerful military on earth"
Originally posted by dbates
Originally posted by intelgurl
The September 2007 raid by Israel on the suspected Syrian nuclear site was as stealthy as it gets
This goes back to the same old same old we saw during the Cold War. The U.S. focuses on smaller precision nuclear weapons while the Russians were making their bombs as big as they could to couner thier lack of aiming skill and rocketry guidance. The story hasn't changed much today. There's no doubt that many countries have excellent air systems that are quite deadly. Pound for pound, the U.S. Air Force is still superior bar none. I'm not just saying that because I was elisted in the USAF for 6 years although that might sway my opinion a little.
[edit on 7-4-2008 by dbates]
Originally posted by dbates
Yes, I found that to be a fascinating indication of how advance U.S. aircraft countermeasure are.
I felt that Israel was not only taking out a suspected nuclear site, there were also doing a "testing 1, 2, 3" of Russia's latest anti-air system export.
The result was powerful in that it once again proved that Western technology was superior.
Originally posted by dbates
According to this Debka article the Syrians don't know if the intruding aircraft came in from the East, West, or South.
Basically they're in the dark as to how the Israeli (Western) aircraft were able to pull off this manuver.
Syrian pride in their newly purchased systems was rapidly deflated with their inablility to do anything to stop the intruding aircraft.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
This goes back to the same old same old we saw during the Cold War. The U.S. focuses on smaller precision nuclear weapons while the Russians were making their bombs as big as they could to couner thier lack of aiming skill and rocketry guidance.
The story hasn't changed much today. There's no doubt that many countries have excellent air systems that are quite deadly.
Pound for pound, the U.S. Air Force is still superior bar none.
I'm not just saying that because I was elisted in the USAF for 6 years although that might sway my opinion a little.
[edit on 7-4-2008 by dbates]
Originally posted by Canada_EH
I suggest you read his posts on this forum and how much or lack or credibility he had after he tried to post his facts compared to a number of our best aviation experts on this forum.
He is informed and does bring up good points in his posts but he suffer from more bias and media brainwashing in my opinion the Intelgurl or a number of our other posters.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
I can imagine that the Russian's and everyone in the region and elsewhere who are dependent on similar systems are now rushing to figure out how to counter such and apparently awesome and utterly effective capability.
The first event in the raid involved Israel's strike aircraft flying into Syria without alerting Syrian air defenses. The ultimate target was a suspected nuclear reactor being developed at Dayr az-Zawr. But the main attack was preceded by an engagement with a single Syrian radar site at Tall al-Abuad near the Turkish border.
The radar site was struck with a combination of electronic attack and precision bombs to allow the Israeli force to enter and exit Syrian airspace unobserved. Subsequently all of Syria's air-defense radar system went off the air for a period of time that encompassed the raid, U.S. intelligence analysts told Aviation Week.
Originally posted by Canada_EH
Stellar I have always tried to respond to you posts in a informed manner and in an effort to draw conclusions. But I always have been at odds to the stand you take or tone you use in drawing your conclusions. I guess over all getting all information can help to root out the truth.
I'm sure there is lots of other forums out there of aviation experts but my point is that the group here has a number of different focuses/interests that help to say point out faked photos or Research accident rates on aircraft and possible reasons why those accidents took place.
Military tactics and identifying aircraft as well that are brought forward is huge and also a critical but open mind to the possible advance projects that are out there that we don't know "about".
Say what you want about the people that contribute just as much or more then you do to this forum.
But when you boil it down you need the people out there that are going to even read or post the stuff to even have the demand for this forum and if you weren't wrong some of the time or if I wasn't just as often. Well then there would be no need for this place.
A bit of a rant I know but I think its something that doesn't get said enough.
Originally posted by xpert11
The USAF may well be a little over confident and underestimate its possible enemy capability's due to the fact it hasn't faced any real test since Vietnam or Korea.
Iraq twice and Afghanistan are and were nothing more then milk runs .
I would still rate the USAF in the world but it remains to be if the correct policy decisions will be made to allow this to continue .
Correct me if I'm wrong but the number of F-22 has been cutback to pay for the war in Iraq. If a new or superior(SP?) weapon is deployed in to few numbers its effectiveness is reduced. This was the case when the British first deployed Tanks during WW1.
I KNEW you didn't like what he (StellarX) posted, because it was facts disprooving the "MYTH" that U.S.A. ALWAYS was better than Russia, instead of pointing out one by one ALL of the "dicredited" things Stellar had said on ATS you just posted this I know why you HAVEN'T: it's because what he posted is "PROOVEN FACTS" you just confirmed it with your LACK of pointing them out!!
Originally posted by Canada_EH
reply to post by StellarX
Stellar I have always tried to respond to you posts in a informed manner and in an effort to draw conclusions. But I always have been at odds to the stand you take or tone you use in drawing your conclusions. I guess over all getting all information can help to root out the truth.
I'm sure there is lots of other forums out there of aviation experts but my point is that the group here has a number of different focuses/interests that help to say point out faked photos or Research accident rates on aircraft and possible reasons why those accidents took place. Military tactics and identifying aircraft as well that are brought forward is huge and also a critical but open mind to the possible advance projects that are out there that we don't know "about".
Say what you want about the people that contribute just as much or more then you do to this forum. But when you boil it down you need the people out there that are going to even read or post the stuff to even have the demand for this forum and if you weren't wrong some of the time or if I wasn't just as often. Well then there would be no need for this place.
A bit of a rant I know but I think its something that doesn't get said enough.