It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pause4thought
At the very least, those who read this might refrain from using long-disproved preconceptions based on crass misinformation.
Originally posted by pause4thought
A simple example is a comparison with the life and deeds of other characters who lived in antiquity. For many of them we have no collection of first-hand eyewitness testimony comparable to the documents of the New Testament, by a long way, yet we all accept without question that they lived and influenced history, and study what has been handed down concerning them largely in good faith.
The book provides specific examples of people no-one would dream of questioning existed, and relates how much documented evidence is actually available. The sum total is sometimes nothing more than a shoe-string compared to the New Testament documentation concerning Jesus Christ.
So, madnessinmysoul, will you actually make the effort and read it? Or the other book I mentioned to you (in your other thread called 'An Experiment for Brave Christians'), namely "Does God Believe in Atheists"?
I ordered the book you were promoting, "The God Delusion", from Amazon today. I've taken up your challenge. Will you take up mine? (Boy, then we can really have a party on here...)
Meantime I'm off to bed. It's 1:38 am in the UK. Does anyone sleep around here?...
...you just made the massive assumption that the new testament is full of first hand eyewitness testimony. considering that it's at least once removed from the events (i'm being very generous here, considering that the early church relied on oral tradition), it's not a first hand account at all
Only two suggested dates for Revelation have received serious support. An early date, shortly after the reign of Nero (A.D. 54-68) is supported by references in the book to the persecution of Christians, the "Nero redivivus" myth..., the imperial cult (ch.13), and the temple (ch.11), which was destroyed in A.D. 70...
The alternate and more generally accepted date rests primarily on the early witness of Irenaeus (185), who stated that the apostle John "saw the revelation... at the close of Domitian's reign" (A.D. 81-96)...
The book actually provides concrete explanations of how we know today's New Testament remains faithful to the original, after all this time. Surprising to many, but the evidence is there.
The biggest problem with the new testament is what happend after it was written.
Originally posted by dbates
reply to post by madnessinmysoul
Question for you. Why don't any of the New Testament books reference the Roman's seige and destruction of Jeruslalem and the Temple in 70 A.D.? Surely a significant event like that would not go unnoticed. The two possible answers are:
A. - The Temple in Jerusalem was not important to the Jews.
B. - The New Testament was written before this event.
now here's a question for you
where's the evidence outside the bible to show that jesus existed?
Quite simply, one must ignore a great deal of evidence, and treat what evidence is left most unfairly, in order to deny that Jesus existed.
bible vs koran is quite the prize fight for which book i most disagree with while still liking some of the teachings...
Originally posted by pause4thought
The book provides specific examples of people no-one would dream of questioning existed, and relates how much documented evidence is actually available. The sum total is sometimes nothing more than a shoe-string compared to the New Testament documentation concerning Jesus Christ.
Extra-biblical sources that have a bearing on the life of Christ are not ignored. In fact numerous tangental and commonly raised questions are addressed in a very readable manner.
Originally posted by HIFIGUY
With recent appearance of additional doctrine, it is clear to me that the entire image of Christ and his teachings are not here in their entirety.
Originally posted by pause4thought
It is clear to Christians that you are a false teacher on very dangerous ground. These are virtually the final words of God's authentic Word:
Extra-biblical sources that have a bearing on the life of Christ are not ignored.
(emphasis added)
an interesting read into the correcting of Biblical doctrine
the entire image of Christ and his teachings
I once had a dream where I was standing in front of a man.
He looked at me and said:
"I AM the Universe "
Jude v.3b
...the faith that was delivered to the saints once for all.
Jude v.17-19
But you, dear friends, remember the words foretold by the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ; they told you, "In the end time there will be scoffers walking according to their own ungodly desires." These people create divisions and are merely natural, not having the Spirit.
Im not blind to the possibility that perhaps there may be others that were not included.
Correct. Common sense also tells any sensible individual that false teachers added and subtracted from Jesus' words according to their own agenda, and that their writings were regarded as spurious. It was common sense they should be excluded from the Bible, and they were.