It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by heelstone
Photographers had just an hour or so before the buildings collapsed. It would be hard to take any amount of pictures of the dead before all the debris fell. Most likely all photographers feared for their lives and stood way back away from the buildings.
FEMA cordoned off the area for several blocks immediately following the collapse of the WTC buildings. Most of the images of the carnage would be lost to history as a result. I'm sure the government has a lot of gory pictures of the event, but more than likely they will never see the light of day for the public to see.
[Edited on 19-2-2004 by heelstone]
Originally posted by 10DeadInside10
I know this may seem sick or wrong to some people, and my intentions aren't sick or wrong. Well my question is why hasn't there been any photos of bodies from 9/11 or photos of gory stuff from that day? I have only seen 1 graphic photo, of a limb, since that event happened. You would think film crews and cameramen would have taken hundreds of hundreds of pictures of the area since it was a big event. So why the lack of pictures?
I'm curious because I find it suspicious that there have been no body pictures or pictures of bodies found in the rubble etc. There's pictures of some dead guy in Wisconsin or whatever who got into a car accident and no one knows who he is, but pictures of his dead body are online still. So I would assume the biggest Terrorist Attack on U.S. soil would have cameras all over the place.
Let me know what you think...
middle eastern passports are indestructible, though. they survive huge fireball of jet fuel, an hour or two of office fire...
Originally posted by 10DeadInside10
I know this may seem sick or wrong to some people, and my intentions aren't sick or wrong. Well my question is why hasn't there been any photos of bodies from 9/11 or photos of gory stuff from that day? I have only seen 1 graphic photo, of a limb, since that event happened. You would think film crews and cameramen would have taken hundreds of hundreds of pictures of the area since it was a big event. So why the lack of pictures?
I'm curious because I find it suspicious that there have been no body pictures or pictures of bodies found in the rubble etc. There's pictures of some dead guy in Wisconsin or whatever who got into a car accident and no one knows who he is, but pictures of his dead body are online still. So I would assume the biggest Terrorist Attack on U.S. soil would have cameras all over the place.
Let me know what you think...
Originally posted by msdos464
middle eastern passports are indestructible, though. they survive huge fireball of jet fuel, an hour or two of office fire...
I think they claimed it flew out of the building when the plane crashed... but it's still strange that it got out of the plane.
Originally posted by msdos464
middle eastern passports are indestructible, though. they survive huge fireball of jet fuel, an hour or two of office fire...
I think they claimed it flew out of the building when the plane crashed... but it's still strange that it got out of the plane.
Originally posted by ashmok
Some of the plane made it through the building, complete with body parts if I remember correctly, so that's one possible route. Also I've read of other belongings from the passengers being found -- an air miles card at the WTC, a driving licence at the Pentagon etc -- so were they "indestructible", too?
Originally posted by billybob
how is it that the pentagon fire vapourized all the aluminum, yet 100% of the passengers had identifiable DNA survive the fire? is DNA more fire resistant then aluminum?
Originally posted by ashmok
As to DNA, that's hard to destroy. Some scientists think there's even a chance of recovering some from cremated remains, others disagree but it does show what might be possible.
In practice it's actually somewhat difficult to completely incinerate human remains. Commercial crematoriums typically expose bodies to 2,000°C for two hours and under these conditions, the ashes will generally not yield DNA, though it's not outwith the realms of possibility. Most remains recovered from building fires, however, are not totally incinerated and will contain viable DNA.
Within the bone, DNA is very stable and can withstand temperatures of several hundred degrees or more for short time periods. It's really only as a bone becomes calcined or has been completely cremated (ie, is ash) where the difficulty becomes impossibility in terms of extracting DNA.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Several hundred thousand tons of debris collapsing onto a body would do a pretty good job of completely destroying a body. Some portions of the building would have had more debris come down in bigger piles than others, causing the bodies to be crushed so small that they couldn't recognize the parts as being from a body. There were survivors found in pockets of debris, where a couple of feet away there was a huge pile of debris.
va·por·ize (vā'pə-rīz') pronunciation
tr. & intr.v., -ized, -iz·ing, -iz·es.
To convert or be converted into vapor.
NEW YORK (AP) — Three months after the World Trade Center attack,
victims' families are being forced to face the ghastly possibility that many of
the dead were "vaporized," as the medical examiner put it, and may never be
identified.