Official QFAC Thread

This thread is where members who are following the ATS election and want to pose a question to the candidates. So without further a do I will get things under way.

Where do you stand on the issue of the separation of the church and the state ?

Cheers xpert11.


Mod edit: fixed title.

[edit on 17-2-2008 by chissler]

reply to post by xpert11



State and Faith (seperating Faith and State)

www.abovepolitics.com...


Religion in Schools and public Places

www.abovepolitics.com...


and i already have a Ask Bodrul
if anyone wants to direct questions at me

www.abovepolitics.com...


i wont be answering any questions in this topic as it will just end up being a cluttter from all us canidates

Well in my book it is OK if you just post a link to your policy in question if it exists already. Anyway onto my next question.

Do you support a budget deficit in return for lower taxation ?

I look forward to the answers.

Originally posted by xpert11
Well in my book it is OK if you just post a link to your policy in question if it exists already. Anyway onto my next question.

Do you support a budget deficit in return for lower taxation ?

I look forward to the answers.

here you go

www.abovepolitics.com...

Bodrul thanks for taking the time to answer my question. Come on people I cant be the only one who has questions for the candidates !


Ok its time for my next question.

How would you deal with Iran ?

Cheers xpert11 .

reply to post by xpert11


www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...

[edit on 21-2-2008 by bodrul]

And I go on .

Who is your running mate and who would you appoint to your cabinet ?

Cheers xpert11.

reply to post by xpert11


www.abovetopsecret.com...

i havent got a running mate sadly (not yet)

This becoming more like twenty questions due to the lack of interest in the election .

What is your stance on the torture of terror suspects ?

What will you do if a VP isnt available from the field that is taking part in the election ?

Cheers xpert11.

[edit on 28-2-2008 by xpert11]

Copied from another thread in this forum.

Two Executive orders were signed by George W Bush that are quite controversial. One was NSPD-51 National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive, that contains the mysterious Annex A and the classified Continuity Annexes. How would you go about getting this piece the Executive order brought into the light?

Also what is your position on Interpretation of the Geneva Conventions Common Article 3 as Applied to a Program of Detention and Interrogation Operated by the Central Intelligence Agency and how in it our current president states quite clearly;

I determined for the United States that members of al Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces are unlawful enemy combatants who are not entitled to the protections that the Third Geneva Convention provides to prisoners of war.

Related ATS Threads on the above Subjects; NSPD-51 and the Potential for a Coup d'état by National Emergency

The Official White House View on Program of Detention and Interrogation

Thank you candidates for your time and your responses.

WUK

reply to post by xpert11


www.abovepolitics.com...

reply to post by whatukno




i will have to get back to this one as its going to take me a while to read through it and make some sense

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Our newly elected President and Vice President team will be awarded their own dedicated forum on AbovePolitics.com (and "Politics" menu item on the ATS content archive) where they will become the site's official political commentators on the events leading up to the actual election in 2008 and more. The team will be the only two able to start new threads in the forum (though anyone can reply), publish articles to the main site archive, and share advertising revenue from their own Google adsense ads.

So polish your platform. Practice your baby-kissing. Develop a killer smile. Brush up on foreign policy.

We need a hero.

Who among you is man/woman enough for this job?

Who of you can take this candidacy and make it run?

What will you do for this board that no other candidate can?

Why should we the ATS members care if you don't care enough to make this thing work?

What changes to the job would you like to see?

Would you be willing to work with the ATS council? to improve this board?