It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OrionStars
Can you touch other 3-D physical matter, such as your own body parts? Can you measure those body parts if necessary? If you have ever been able to do at least that much touching or measuring, you just answered your own question, and realized your own conclusion is wrong.
Originally posted by deezee
That's what i said.
You can touch an object and measure it's dimensions, with a certain man made object. But you can not measure or touch a dimension.
5.6 Airborne Holographic Projector
Brief Description
The holographic projector displays a three-dimensional visual image in a desired location, removed from the display generator. The projector can be used for psychological operations and strategic perception management. It is also useful for optical deception and cloaking, providing a momentary distraction when engaging an unsophisticated adversary.
web.archive.org...://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/volume4/chap03/img00098.gif
Capabilities
* Precision projection of 3-D visual images into a selected area
* Supports PSYOP and strategic deception management
* Provides deception and cloaking against optical sensors
Enabling Technologies (MCTL)
* 4.1.4, Image Processing (holographic displays)
* 10.1, Lasers
* 10.2, Optics
* 10.3, Power Systems
White Papers
* Q, Special & Humanitarian Operations
* N, Strategic Attack
web.archive.org...:/www.au.af.mil/au/2025/volume4/chap03/b5_6.htm
The Gulf War hologram story might be dismissed were it not the case that washingtonpost.com has learned that a super secret program was established in 1994 to pursue the very technology for PSYOPS application. The "Holographic Projector" is described in a classified Air Force document as a system to "project information power from space ... for special operations deception missions."
Originally posted by deezee
All i said was, that you can not do these things with the first three dimensions either. And that you can measure all four of them with man made tools.
So what conclusion of mine is wrong?
Originally posted by OrionStars
I forgot to ask. Exactly what four dimensions do you plan on physically measuring? We live an abstract 3-D not abstract 4-D world in the context you have chosen to use the word dimension.
Originally posted by deezee
It's about time, remember? You said you cant touch it or smell it....
I was comparing this to the fact, that for measuring the dimensions of an object, you need a man made tool, just like for measuring time, which is sometimes called the fourth dimension.
Originally posted by OrionStars
As I have already explained to you, dimensions come in two forms. Abstact form which cannot be physically measured without acting on physical matter, and physical dimension of a physical object.
Originally posted by OrionStars
Time and space are abstract concepts humans desired to physically capture but never actually could. They can only capture abstract concepts, of time and space, by word definition and nothing more. As I previously stated, humans are the only members of the animal kingdom having attempted to capture abstract concepts of time and space, by word definitions and nothing more.
Originally posted by OrionStars
Time and space are classified under quantum mechanics not physical matter.
Originally posted by deezee
And this is exactly what i meant, when i said, that for measuring dimensions you need a tool, that was created by, and given meaning to, by us humans.
Originally posted by OrionStars
Time and space are classified under quantum mechanics not physical matter.
Where did i say this? Besides, what are you arguing against anyway?
Originally posted by OrionStars
You did not. I did when briefly explaining it to you that your conclusion was wrong.
Originally posted by deezee
Originally posted by OrionStars
You did not. I did when briefly explaining it to you that your conclusion was wrong.
Yeah, but see, the problem is, i don't know which conclusion you are even talking about.
Is it the one, that time is sometimes considered a dimension? The comparison between time and the usual three dimensions? Or what? I seriously don't know what you are trying to say anymore..
Originally posted by OrionStars
Originally posted by deezee
As I have already explained to you, dimensions come in two forms. Abstact form which cannot be physically measured without acting on physical matter, and physical dimension of a physical object. Physically measuring the size, of a physcial object, is its dimensions. On earth, physical objects come in 1 (length), 2 (length and width) and 3 (length, width, and depth) dimensions and no other.
Originally posted by jfj123
How do you measure a dimension such as length, width or depth? Thanks.
[edit on 11-2-2008 by jfj123]
Originally posted by OrionStars
Originally posted by jfj123
How do you measure a dimension such as length, width or depth? Thanks.
[edit on 11-2-2008 by jfj123]
Since I cannot physically demonstrate how to do that in this discussion, I have to ask this question of you. Have you taken the classes of geometry and trigonometry? If so, then you have answered your own question as to how. You would also know the physical tools used normally consist of these 3-D objects - ruler, protractor, compass, paper, pencil or pen, and eraser or white out in case human error.
Now I have a question for you. How does anything concerning dimensions relevantly relate to holography possibility or impossibility? Holography is the topic of this discussion.
Our physical space is observed to have only three large dimensions — and taken together with time as the fourth dimension — a physical theory must take this into account
There are three conventional spatial dimensions: length (or depth), width, and height, often expressed as 'x', 'y' and 'z'. 'x' and 'y' axes appear on a plane Cartesian graph. In the 3rd dimension, a 'z' is used and is found in functions such as a "z-buffer" in computer graphics, for processing "depth" in imagery. The fourth dimension is often identified with time in physics, and as such is used to explain the non-Euclidean space-time used in Einstein's theories of special relativity and general relativity.
Originally posted by jfj123
So you are using human created tools to measure human created distance to understand a human created perception of the distance.
We can also measure time with human created tools.
That was my only point from previous posts.
As to what classes I've taken, geometry, trig, calc, advanced analytic calc, and 4 advanced physics courses.
Originally posted by OrionStars
Originally posted by jfj123
So you are using human created tools to measure human created distance to understand a human created perception of the distance.
We can also measure time with human created tools.
That was my only point from previous posts.
As to what classes I've taken, geometry, trig, calc, advanced analytic calc, and 4 advanced physics courses.
Are you saying using physical tools, in order to measure physical objects, can be an illusion not a realtiy? If so, you have taken this discussion into philosophy, which has nothing to do with the topic.
Time is not a physical object. It is a abstract perception conceived in the human brain.
Please forget the fourth dimension. It has nothing to do with this topic.
Fourth dimension discussion belongs on a philosophy forum discussion site, not this forum. It is obvious some posters do not understand the abstract concept of hypothetical, lacking in physical substance matter, fourth dimension. If I want hypotheses and theories on the fourth dimension, I can easily access that on reruns of the "Twilight Zone".
Originally posted by jfj123
Just to help us get back on topic, does anyone have any evidence that holograms can be used in the required manor which could create the planes as seen on 9/11??
We know holograms exist in a limited manor.
Originally posted by OrionStars
Originally posted by jfj123
Just to help us get back on topic, does anyone have any evidence that holograms can be used in the required manor which could create the planes as seen on 9/11??
We know holograms exist in a limited manor.
Again, the topic only dealt with the possibly based on known technology
, and highly potential unknown sophisticated technology involving DOD and Pentagon secret projects.
Known technology has repeatedly been posted to this discussion.
No other proof was required as to possiblity. The topic is possibility not demanded proof. I stated that from the very beginning and periodically throughout the entire discussion.
Why keep demanding more proof, simply to reject it out-of-hand
, as well, as use that as a lame excuse to go off on tangents unrelated to the topic?