Originally posted by traderonwallst
reply to post by elaine
I think the world finally realizes that Global Warming is a scam. It is not nturally occuring (but instead a cyclical phenomanom) and the Kyoto
agreement is the UN's idea of taxing the rich nations and giving to the poorer ones. Oh wait, China and India are not really that poor.
I think you've pretty much nailed it. Except that it is totally a naturally occuring cycle.
Steve mcintyre has already proven that Hansen at nasa is a liar, manipulator and has an agenda.
He is the one who publicly forced hansen to withdraw the "hottest year on record" (nasa/hansen's data said it was 1998) and correct it to 1934
showing that AGW is a scam, does hold up to scrutiny, or science.
It showed hansen was manipulating his data sets, and for many years.
Clinton, Obama Sign onto to Boxer’s $4,500 Climate Tax on American Families
Senate Environment & Public Works Chairman Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) have proposed the “Global Warming Pollution
Reduction Act” aimed at combating climate change. The proposed partisan bill (S.309) is supported by another 15 senators, including: Sen. Hillary
Rodham Clinton (D-NY); Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL); Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (D-CT); Sen. Joseph R. Biden (D-DE); Sen. Daniel K.
Akaka (D-HI); Sen. Russell D. Feingold (D-WI); Sen. Daniel K. Inouye (D-HI); Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-MA); Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ); Sen.
Patrick J. Leahy (D-VT); Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ); Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI); Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI); Sen. Barbara A. Mikulski (D-MD), and Sen.
Benjamin L. Cardin (D-MD).
FACT: A new MIT study concludes that the Sanders-Boxer approach would impose a tax-equivalent of $366 billion annually, or more than $4,500 per family
of four, by 2015. And the annual costs will grow after 2015.
The Kyoto Protocol would have imposed an equivalent tax of over $300 billion a year, 10 times the size of the Clinton-Gore tax increase of 1993. In
addition to the MIT study, a new Congressional Budget Office study released recently, details how a carbon cap-and-trade system would result in
massive wealth redistribution from the poor and working class to wealthier Americans. [Read more on CBO study]
Senator James Inhofe (R-Okla.), EPW Ranking Member, said today: “Carbon caps would artificially and needlessly raise the cost of energy the most on
the people least able to afford it. It astounds me that any Senator could support such a proposal.”
Money. Your money.
Cap-and-Trade Could Cost Average Family $10,800 in Lost Income, Says Economist Arthur Laffer; Proposed Global Warming Policy Likened to 1970s-Era
WASHINGTON, Sept. 17 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- A cap-and-trade scheme
for controlling greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) would impose significant
economic costs on the U.S. economy and is not a sound policy response to
current concerns about global warming, says renown economist Arthur Laffer
in a new study released today.
Money. Your money.
Liar liar, pants about ready to explode.
Now, why isn't cute lil Katie Couric-ovich telling us all this, hmmm?
Because she's a well reknowned AGW scientist, right?
Can you say socialist?
Can you say Agenda?
AGW is a hoax, and after many trillions of your dollars are separated from you, then the truth will come out.
But it will come later, not sooner.
Money to be made.... your money.
And The U.N. to grab our power. Your power.
AGW is without doubt the biggest wealth redistribution scam in history, but from the U.S. to the socialist nations and the U.N.
Hitlary will make sure of it.
AGW is without doubt the biggest hoax in history.
Hitlary will be sure it happens. If you let her.