posted on Sep, 30 2007 @ 02:59 PM
It's really obvious to anyone who cares to look/think that building 7 was taken down... even if you don't believe that 1&2 were wired (I don't... I
think the plane damage took 'em out).
Building 7 is a glaring issue despite everything else involved in 9/11.
It was "pulled" despite having very little structural damage. They didn't have time to clear out the offices and servers that were in there. It
made a handy way to claim extra insurance money and destroy a whole lot of information.
Remember, I don't buy the theories that towers 1 and 2 were taken down by anything more than an unfortunate series of flukes related to unique
construction, engineering over sites, the complex physics involved in when that much mass starts moving, and possibly cutting corners by using
Generally I'm a 9/11 theory skeptic, but building 7 stinks of cover up.
[edit on 30-9-2007 by BitRaiser]