It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TwoSheds
Incidentally, this whole thread is misleading. For 3 or 4 years the insistence was that the calls had been made from cell phones. These claims were quite specific; there was no "mistake" in the heat of the moment.
Originally posted by six
It has been shown that the cell phones, with the technology at that time, would work to 50,000 feet. The max altitude for 93 was 44,000 ft. Wy would cell phones not work?
Originally posted by six
It has been shown that the cell phones, with the technology at that time, would work to 50,000 feet. The max altitude for 93 was 44,000 ft. Wy would cell phones not work?
Originally posted by six
Can not versions of the story change as more and more evidence comes out?
Originally posted by six
Have you ever been in a "heat of the moment" type incident?..I have...More times than I care to talk about. Time changes..things are said ... Nobody is sure what is going on...Every single persons event is different in some way, even though they are at the same place. So nick picking at comments that were made..what people said that they saw/heard, in the "heat of the moment" does not lend credence to finding the truth. I think the term is "the fog of war".
Originally posted by six
BTW ....I did not know you were privy to the inner workings and secrets of the Irannian goverment. Another discussion...another time
Downs, a software salesman, learned of the terrorist attacks while on a commercial flight returning home from South America. The captain explained that "terrorist attacks on airplanes" meant they were making an emergency landing. People on board using cell phones soon discovered the true nature of the day's events.
"We found out from people using their phones that the World Trade Center was hit, and some unspecified area in Washington," Downs recalls.
...we were forced to make an emergency landing in Cleveland because there were reports that a bomb or hijacking was taking place on our plane. The pilot had radioed that there was suspicious activity in the cabin since one of the passengers was speaking urgently on his cellphone and ignored repeated flight attendant requests to stop using his cell phone while in flight
When it comes to land and air, the capabilities of a cell phone don’t change. But what makes it possible to use a handheld while in a plane 10,000 feet in the air, and why should it work there when it doesn’t work in your own neighborhood?
It all depends on where the phone is, says Marco Thompson, president of the San Diego Telecom Council. “Cell phones are not designed to work on a plane. Although they do.” The rough rule is that when the plane is slow and over a city, the phone will work up to 10,000 feet or so. “Also, it depends on how fast the plane is moving and its proximity to antennas,” Thompson says. “At 30,000 feet, it may work momentarily while near a cell site, but it’s chancy and the connection won’t last.” Also, the hand-off process from cell site to cell site is more difficult. It is created for a maximum speed of 60 mph to 100 mph. “They are not built for 400 mph airplanes
Cell phones work on airplanes? Why does the FAA discourage their use? What's the maximum altitude at which a cell phone will work?
From this morning's New York Times: "According to industry experts, it is possible to use cell phones with varying success during the ascent and descent of commercial airline flights, although the difficulty of maintaining a signal appears to increase as planes gain altitude. Some older phones, which have stronger transmitters and operate on analog networks, can be used at a maximum altitude of 10 miles, while phones on newer digital systems can work at altitudes of 5 to 6 miles. A typical airline cruising altitude would be 35,000 feet, or about 6.6 miles."
Originally posted by six
Nope...not a lie... Those phone calls were made...I was the recipent. They were not on any military comms....I am not discounting your expertise. I am taking you at your word that you are what you say you are. Now, calling me a liar, without merit, is something else. You do not know me..therefore you are not qualified to call me a liar. I have no reason to lie. Nothing to gain. Nothing. I was passing along a ancedote from my past that happened several times.
I will point up to Capt O's post above for more proof. Thank you C.
Here are the facts
-Hotard says there was a deactivation order issued prior to 9/11/2001 according to Tulsa MX facility. But no record of AA77 having the phones deactivated (pretty much what we state in the article).
- 757 AMM page dated 01/28/01 says ECO F0878 was the order which deactivated the phones. ECO F1463 and F1532 were the orders to remove the phones. (I dont think anyone disputes the authenticity of the 757 AMM page anymore, although AMTMAN and Pat still refuse to post it)
- Chad Kinder says in an email the phones were deactivated on AA77 and that all pax used cell phones. When asked to confirm his email, Chad replied, "It sounds like an accurate statement, let me check the FAQ database in which we pull all our replies to FAQ's". Anxious to help at initially, following up with Chad on the subject, he refused to talk and handed us over to AA Legal Dept. (all recorded)
- AA Legal Dept refused to go 'on record' saying AA77 had active phones on board. They replied they will find out for us. They have not followed up or returned calls. Again, recorded.
- Anonymous AMTMAN shows up on the web with paperwork that contradicts all of the above, doesnt give his name to Pat (as our ource has done for us), and you people lap it up like puppies eating peanut butter...
I think that about sums it up... enjoy your weekend all..
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Fraz... please show your data to back up your claims.
Originally posted by six
Since you chose to ignore Capt O's post....What about his references? What about Popular Mechanics?
Originally posted by six
Your thoughts on Popular Mechanics?
Originally posted by six
I research before I post on here. To me without doing so is a insult to yours and my intelligence..and a waste of time.
A reference was given above by Capt O...You thoughts please. Your thoughts on Popular Mechanics?