It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


PAK FA vs. F-22

page: 1

log in


posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 02:59 AM
I really concern about that Raptor was made coz Su-27 and T-50 was made coz Raptor, um.

in the future warfare we can't deny that everyone makes their own toys.

so if the US think they have the best fighter in the world, they should think twice!

Raptor vs. any 4th gen. fighter? oke....! but 5th against 5th?

i don't thik so.

for me, T-50 still more superior than F-22.

the reason of that:
- logicly, Russian will not make newer, worse, and will lose in battle.

- the G limits of T-50 is up to 10-11g

- armament load capacity up to 8 missiles(8 medium range missiles)/(Raptor also carry 8, but the config. is 6 AMRAAMs, and 2 Sidewinder)

- the speed is faster (like mach 2.1, quiet good to avoid Raptor's 9g manuev.)

- plasma clouds tech.,

- ect., say a word

the conclusion is, the Lockheed should upgrade the Raptor into greater block

that's my opinion

thx before

[edit on 9/14/2007 by Eastpolar Commander]

posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 03:15 AM
Your other A vs. B thread was closed.

What on earth makes you think this one will be different?

For the record I expect the PAK-FA to include things that aren't on the (initial) F-22s, simply because it has been designed (if its still even finalised!) much more recently. But the support systems that will always be present with an F-22 in a battlefield will be near impossible to beat.

[edit on 14/9/07 by kilcoo316]

posted on Sep, 14 2007 @ 03:33 AM
Please review the guidelines...

Mod Note: Aircraft Projects Forum Posting Guidelines – Please Review This Link.


Thread closed.

new topics

log in