It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Unisol
hell yea as i sayd before^^ way to go russia^^ father of all bombs sounds just to cool
ii. Father Of All Bombs is a direct play of Mother Of All Bombs. Don't be too quick to congratulate them for their naming scheme.
iii. Much like the Tsar Bomba, and MOAB, I expect this weapon more of a show of what can be done than of an actual, conventional piece of military hardware.
Originally posted by iskander
The news report gives the blast radius as 300m not 2600m
The report stated that the blast radius is 20 times larger then MOAB. MOABS blast radious is 130 meters.
A blast radius of 2600m would be 3 1/4 miles across and no way was the explosion in the video 3 1/4 miles across.
Nope. 2600 meters is 2.6 kilometers, which is in no way 3 and ¼ of a mile.
Go here - meyerweb.com... and look for your self what kind of a yield a bomb will need to create a blast that will cover 10 miles.
What I’ve seen shows blast overpressure which collapsed a brick/concrete building and popped a BTR like a soda can, while leaving no burn/scorch marks, nor shrap damage, thus showing that such overpressure was created well outside of the blast epicenter.
i. MOAB has never been used in combat, to my knowledge.
Originally posted by iskander
Originally posted by iskander
The news report gives the blast radius as 300m not 2600m
The report stated that the blast radius is 20 times larger then MOAB. MOABS blast radious is 130 meters.
Good morning, General.
Thanks for joining us.
BRIG. GEN. DAVID GRANGE, U.S. ARMY (RETIRED): Good morning.
ZAHN: I know you have witnessed this particular bomb in use. Describe to us the impact of it.
GRANGE: Yes, this, the MOAB is a 21,000 pound bomb improvement of the 15,000 pound Vietnam era daisy cutter. Thirty something plus years later, now used in Afghanistan against hardened targets in the mountains around Tora Bora and elsewhere. And it has a psychological and a killing effect, obviously, and it can be used for other purposes, as well.
ZAHN: How effective is its killing effect?
GRANGE: Well, what it does is it just, you can, it can be used above ground, which this test is an example of, to, it sucks the air out of the area. It'll kill people, but it'll also destroy equipment. It can also be, there's some expectation to use this in a penetrating manner to take out hardened bunkers underground.
But it can also be used as an example to clear minefields, to provide a gap in a strip of mine field so forces can pass through. It can also be used to put out, let's say, a fire. If oil is lit in trench lines by an enemy force, this bomb as it sucks the air out of the area can neutralize a fire.
So it can be used for several different types of targets.
The U.S. has not/ does NOT posses a 15K lb Bomb (daisy cutter), with GPS. The MOAB is the first with GPS and it's not 21,000 lb, it's 18,700 lb of explosives and a 2300lb shell, and yes the FOAB is more powerful.
Originally posted by iskander
The news report gives the blast radius as 300m not 2600m
Well that’s just it. US first used large fuel air bombs as engineering tools to clear jungles (daisy cutter), but then militarized then into GPS guided munitions.
The Russian Military knows more about the FOAB than you, so untill you provide the proof that FOAB is not more powerful than MOAB your statement is null.
Originally posted by mad scientist
The FOAB on the other hand only reaches it's maximum potential of 44 tons when atmospheric conditions are ideal. For example if there was high wind then a significant portion of the vapour cloud could be dispersed before detonation, the same if there was a storm. Heavy rain would also disrupt the vapour cloud.
The Russian Military knows more about the FOAB than you, so untill you provide the proof that FOAB is not more powerful than MOAB your statement is null.
Originally posted by mad scientist
Originally posted by deltaboy
Did the bomb actually dropped from the Blackjack? Because the way it dropped is similar to the way the Daisycutter was dropping with its parachute coming out on the C-130.
You look at the video the parachute would have been caught into the rear of the plane of its bomb bays. I mean look at how bombs are dropped from that kind of design, its free fall, not going to the rear and drop. The camera doesn't show the inside of the plane as the bomb is dropped. And after the bomb is dropped you don't see the Blackjack immediately. The camera is not showing it at least when the bomb is coming out of the plane.
Just thinking out loud.
Originally posted by YASKY
Yes I did read what you wrote and thats WHY I wrote what I said, I took a look at the whole thing and asked my self questions that many people ask, "Why is it that U.S. civillians are always trying to make people believe they know more than Russian military designers?