It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jon1
Jesus will come out on top because there is only him who is alive
All the others are dead or idols.
Originally posted by I See You
Why is it that the gods themselves don't handle the differances man to man and winner take all? Who will come out on top?
Originally posted by jon1
I bet that felt good madness. Get one in so to speak. There is nothing arrogant about the truth, If you wanted directions to somewhere and saw two people in the street but one was dead, who would you ask.
Seems very logical to me.
Sounds like an admission to there being Gods out there madness. No, Can't be.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
Originally posted by jon1
I bet that felt good madness. Get one in so to speak. There is nothing arrogant about the truth, If you wanted directions to somewhere and saw two people in the street but one was dead, who would you ask.
but you don't have the truth, you have what you have faith in, that doesn't make it the truth. your religion is just as valid as odinism, pastafarianism, shintoism, islam, hinduism, buddhism, paganism, tribal religions, etc, because they all have an equal amount of supporting evidence
none.
Seems very logical to me.
it's quite the opposite, it's illogical. it's based solely on faith.
Sounds like an admission to there being Gods out there madness. No, Can't be.
it's called speaking in a hypothetical.
Originally posted by jon1
Not only do i have proof but I also have evidence, The proof is multiple witnesses to events and the evidence is the people who have been the subject of Gods healing. and medical records to show the ailments were real before the healing.
So, Madness. Hop on a plane and lets show you the truth. But wait, that would spoil all your fun. Quick, find some fancy words or equally lame excuses to get you out of this one.
If someone can be convicted of murder with only two witnesses, surely something must be equally as true if you have eight. Well it would be in a court of law. But not good enough for you though i bet.
Originally posted by jon1
Not only do i have proof but I also have evidence, The proof is multiple witnesses to events
and the evidence is the people who have been the subject of Gods healing. and medical records to show the ailments were real before the healing.
So, Madness. Hop on a plane and lets show you the truth. But wait, that would spoil all your fun. Quick, find some fancy words or equally lame excuses to get you out of this one.
If someone can be convicted of murder with only two witnesses, surely something must be equally as true if you have eight.
Well it would be in a court of law. But not good enough for you though i bet.
Originally posted by Jaruseleh
Originally posted by jon1
Not only do i have proof but I also have evidence, The proof is multiple witnesses to events and the evidence is the people who have been the subject of Gods healing. and medical records to show the ailments were real before the healing.
So, Madness. Hop on a plane and lets show you the truth. But wait, that would spoil all your fun. Quick, find some fancy words or equally lame excuses to get you out of this one.
If someone can be convicted of murder with only two witnesses, surely something must be equally as true if you have eight. Well it would be in a court of law. But not good enough for you though i bet.
I'd just like to point something out: Ask any scientist what the WORST form of proof of ANYTHING is, and they will tell you "eye witness" because the human mind has a tendancy to see what it wants to see.
Also, generally speaking, Court Cases aren't settled based on eye witness...eye witnesses can help the case, but I don't believe there are too many, if any, cases that were closed solely because someone saw something. Usually there is other evidence presented along with the eye witness testimonial. And lastly, eye witnesses still don't necessarily make the scenerio true...many people have been wrongly accused and sent to prison, even though there were so-called "eye witnesses." Turns out the eye witnesses didn't actually see what they thought they saw...
As far as God's healing, the only way to prove that God actually did heal anyone is to have a video recording of God actually standing with the patient healing them. Obviously, that's not going to happen, so there will never be concrete proof it happened. Just because you believe God healed someone, doesn't mean it's fact.
I've noticed that one of the most difficult things for theists to do is differentiate between "Fact" and "Belief". I suggest any of you theists out there who have this problem go to www.dictionary.com and look both words up. Maybe some of the arguments we have could be resolved just because we may not be on the same page. I'm not trying to be a jerk either, I'm dead serious. It might actually help....
[edit on 20-8-2007 by Jaruseleh]
Sorry friend but your subjective experiences are in no way proof of god or that a god heals. It might be a placebo effect that helped these people so unjustly ascribing these healings to your god is in no way a FACT. I mean how do you know it was your god anyway?
Originally posted by jon1
So, if you had been where these things happen and you know that the ailments are genuine because you know the people themselves, I think you would have to go away and have a good think about how real God is.
As far as eye witnesses are concerned these are the best because they know the people, they know the ailments are real, can be backed up by doctors, and the end result. Well, it is there before your very eyes.
Yes God does heal, and thats a fact.
Originally posted by shihulud
Sorry friend but your subjective experiences are in no way proof of god or that a god heals. It might be a placebo effect that helped these people so unjustly ascribing these healings to your god is in no way a FACT. I mean how do you know it was your god anyway?
Originally posted by jon1
So, if you had been where these things happen and you know that the ailments are genuine because you know the people themselves, I think you would have to go away and have a good think about how real God is.
As far as eye witnesses are concerned these are the best because they know the people, they know the ailments are real, can be backed up by doctors, and the end result. Well, it is there before your very eyes.
Yes God does heal, and thats a fact.
G
We have only your word for these 'instant physical healings' but as I said you still cannot attribute these so called healings to your 'god' just because you feel that it was. Whether or not these people were trully healed is immaterial when deciding whether it was your god, another god or some natural phenomena that was involved - your personal preferrence on the cause is unproven.
Originally posted by jon1
Instant physical healings a placebo, Give me a break.
How do i know it was my God anyway? Because it was my God that i prayed to, not the tooth fairy.
Mind you, people didn't even believe in Jesus when he was doing the healings many years ago so i don't expect anyone to believe me really.
Anyway i am going to drop this thread now as i have said what i wanted to and i'm off on holiday for a couple of weeks.
[edit on 21-8-2007 by jon1]