It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tyranny22
I wasn't insinuating that the waters actually rose that high. I mean that the city might have been built in anticipation, just in case.
After all, if you moved a society 50 miles inland and you were having to move it another 50 miles inland after 500 years and again and again, eventually I'd just place the damned thing on top of a mountain and say, "Well, no where to go from here."
But, who knows. It's probably just a city that was built when an emporer said, "You know, I'd like a nice retreat up in the mountains."
9,000 years ago, this place was home to one of the world's largest settlements!
At a time when most of the world's people were nomadic hunter-gatherers, Çatalhöyük was a bustling town of as many as 10,000 people.
The accompanying seismic sea-wave '...flooded in far over the land and overwhelmed the city and its surroundings, and the swell of the sea so covered the sacred grove of Poseidon that nothing could be seen but the tops of the trees. A sudden tremor was sent by the god, and with the earthquake the sea ran back, dragging down Helike into the receding waters with every living person.'
April 4, 2007—Were ancient Egyptian cities leveled by the massive volcanic eruption that may have inspired the legend of Atlantis?
Egyptian archaeologists Monday announced they had found traces of solidified lava on the Sinai peninsula while excavating an ancient fort. According to Zahi Hawass, secretary general of Egypt's Supreme Council for Antiquities, the lava hails from Santorini, whose giant eruption 3,500 years ago destroyed the Minoan civilization on nearby Crete.
A massive tsunami smashed Mediterranean shores some 8,000 years ago when a giant chunk of volcano fell into the sea, researchers say.
Originally posted by 2PacSade
If they built it because the waters rose then there would be evidence, ( beach sand, sea shells, etc. ), to prove how high the waters actually rose.
I think the reason for the elevation is that in any battle he who controls the "high" ground is usually at an advantage. . .
Originally posted by Evasius
The story according to the BBC webpage you've linked to is from Saturday, 19 January, 2002. Not sure why we never heard anything else about this in the past 5 years.
Maybe they found something vastly important & ground-breaking that it needed to be covered up.
Originally posted by tyranny22
After all, if you moved a society 50 miles inland and you were having to move it another 50 miles inland after 500 years and again and again, eventually I'd just place the damned thing on top of a mountain and say, "Well, no where to go from here."
Originally posted by Malichai
The Great Flood stories now have a little more support.
[edit on 25-7-2007 by Malichai]
Originally posted by cybertroy
The question is, is some of earth's history we learn about in school an intentional lie?
Originally posted by earth2
If the waters started rising 3 0r 4 inches a year im sure that would spook a lot of people. And then not sure when it was going to stop you could only assume the worst. So high ground would definetly be a safe zone.
Originally posted by Malichai
The Great Flood stories now have a little more support.
[edit on 25-7-2007 by Malichai]
Machu Pichu is only about 600 years old, built around AD 1450.