It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
You seem dark and full of bitterness.
You are starting to lose control and expose your deep hatred for people in the truth movement in creepy unstable kind of way.
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
They locked your thread calling for people to contact victim's families so you brought that strange rhetoric over here by trying to insinuate it is somehow my responsibility to prove who killed their loved ones or the exact method that was used to murder them.
It makes no sense and it is odd.
I've seen stories, corroborated by witnesses, that U.S. forces have captured Satan himself in Iraq, how microscopic aliens live in our carpets, and how Bigfoot is battling space aliens to protect his home turf.
Originally posted by johnlear
(1) That U.S. Forces have captured Satan himself in Iraq and how microscopic aliens live in our carpets[
(3) How Bigfoot is battling space aliens to protect his home turf.
I hope this helps.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Sorry Trip,
Your theory is the one that is creepy. You are the one that has made this theory up, you should explain it. What happened to the plane..the passengers...etc.
You should also let others in here know MORE about your charachter. ie: that you believe in Chem Trails. Also you believe there was a missle on planes that hit the twin towers. THAT my friend is creepy.
Where is your eye witness to a flyover? With the MANY witnesses to the plane hitting the pentagon not ONE has come out to say they saw a flyover.
Again, I ask you... how many arrests have been made? You bragged for weeks that this "smoking gun" was going to lead to arrests. Well? How many so far?
Originally posted by nick7261
If you claim to be a top notch researcher, and you cite Operation Northwoods as a template for 9/11, then it would follow that you might want to confirm whether or not the victims were real or made up CIA identities. You should know that Northwoods called for false hijackings, comlpete with false passengers and false funerals. Northwoods did not call for actually downing a real commercial airliner and murdering U.S. citizens.
So if you're going to reference Northwoods, you need to be intellectually honest. The truth is there is no doubt that the passengers on all 4 9/11 flights were real people, and they left behind real families. This means for your Pentagon flyover theory to be correct, you must also account for what happened to the real people who boarded Flight 77 and never returned home.
In my opinion, stating the obvious, that radical muslims would be more likely to have no problem killing 11-year old American children than U.S. special ops is not creepy -it's self-evident. More to the point, you have shown no evidence that deals at all with Flight 77.
So what's the next step in your theory? That U.S. government black ops gassed the passengers, burned their bodies, and snuck their remains into the Pentagon when nobody was looking? How did they get their DNA? Did they falsify the entire DNA results?
See, it's real easy to come up with a tabloid-like story and stray witnesses to confirm it. I've seen stories, corroborated by witnesses, that U.S. forces have captured Satan himself in Iraq, how microscopic aliens live in our carpets, and how Bigfoot is battling space aliens to protect his home turf. Oh yeah... and how a mystery plane flew over the Pentagon while at precisely the exact moment of the flyover a missile hit the Pentagon and bombs destroyed the inside of the building.
Just because a there's a large market of people that believe these stories doesn't mean your "research" is comprehensive, or that your conclusions are valid.
No, the PentaCon is not a hoax. It's more like a tabloid story that sensationalizes a tiny sliver of eye-witness reports and then misleadingly extrapolates this data into a pre-determined conclusion.
Someday I'll probably be watching you explain your "smoking gun evidence" on the next incarnation of the Rosie O'Donnell show, along with watching the "truth movement" sink further out of the mainstream and into the realm of the alien autopsy video.
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
I may be a "top notch researcher" even if I have never said this as you claim but you are certainly not a top notch comprehender of the English language.
Incorrect. You have not provided a single witness account that directly contradicts them. The conclusion is strictly a result of this testimony. You will not find a single quote attributed to me before 11/07/2006 asserting a flyover. So either back up your claims or post another retraction or you have admitted you are lying about what I have said.
The north side claim is not a theory. It is hard evidence. You are reaching pathetically hard and it is transparent.
Originally posted by nick7261
If you claim to be a top notch researcher, and you cite Operation Northwoods as a template for 9/11, then it would follow that you might want to confirm whether or not the victims were real or made up CIA identities. You should know that Northwoods called for false hijackings, comlpete with false passengers and false funerals. Northwoods did not call for actually downing a real commercial airliner and murdering U.S. citizens.
So if you're going to reference Northwoods, you need to be intellectually honest. The truth is there is no doubt that the passengers on all 4 9/11 flights were real people, and they left behind real families. This means for your Pentagon flyover theory to be correct, you must also account for what happened to the real people who boarded Flight 77 and never returned home.
In my opinion, stating the obvious, that radical muslims would be more likely to have no problem killing 11-year old American children than U.S. special ops is not creepy -it's self-evident.
Just because a there's a large market of people that believe these stories doesn't mean your "research" is comprehensive, or that your conclusions are valid.
No, the PentaCon is not a hoax. It's more like a tabloid story that sensationalizes a tiny sliver of eye-witness reports and then misleadingly extrapolates this data into a pre-determined conclusion.
Someday I'll probably be watching you explain your "smoking gun evidence" on the next incarnation of the Rosie O'Donnell show, along with watching the "truth movement" sink further out of the mainstream and into the realm of the alien autopsy video.
Stating that your witnesses provide "smoking gun," "hard evidence" based on leading questions and who knows what other type of prep work does not constitute hard evidence in my opinion.
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
I concur with no notes needed...
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
Ignoring your baseless accusations; eyewitness testimony becomes hard evidence when it is corroborated. Particularly when it is quadruple corroborated and two of the witnesses are police officers who were on duty.
Originally posted by johnlear
Originally posted by nick7261
I hope this helps.
Nope. Couldn't find those or the one about the aliens living in the carpet. It may be your posted dates. Weekly World News is published weekly. Its possible that you are being less than honest Nick7261 and that you made those stories up. There is a note in the T&C about posting information you know to be false. Unless of course you have personal information about aliens in a carpet. So which is it?
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
Repeating over and over that we "ignored" the fact that they believed the plane hit the building does not make that lie correct.
The north side claim disproves the impact regardless of the fact that they were deceived.
Originally posted by nick7261
I hereby formally retract my comment that you ignored this evidence and instead claim that you selectively concluded that this portion of the witnesses recollections were simply a result of them being fooled by the precision plan to set of explosions at the precise time the decoy plane flew above the Pentagon.
Don't you find it odd that they were able to time the explosions to the millisecond but somehow missed the flight path by 20 degrees?
Or maybe the preponderance of both eye-witness and physical evidence that corroborates American Airlines Flight 77 hitting the Pentaon on a flight path south of the Citgo gas station is what disproves your witnesses' north-of-the-Citgo recollections.
I suggest you use the telephone and call Weekly World News to confirm these stories. Or maybe write to them. Here's their contact information:
Weekly World News
1000 American Media Way
Boca Raton FL, 33464-1000
Please let us know when you complete your ground breaking research on this.